Russell Brandon
LightNews LightNews
banner
runtzel.bsky.social
Russell Brandon
@runtzel.bsky.social
390 followers 820 following 530 posts
Library Barbarian, Cognitive Scientist
|: play is how we learn to :| games is arts is books is talks (he/him), tratando de aprender español, gracias por tu paciencia, scrooge in training
Posts Replies Media Videos
runtzel.bsky.social
It's fucking maddening. Motherfuckers make the "rules" for shit like this and then shrug like it's fucking gravity.
November 21, 2025 at 6:36 AM
Reposted by Russell Brandon
jrbolt.bsky.social
Capitalism, the casino game for rich degenerates that kills millions and imperils the earth even when they win. And when they lose, hooooboy
November 18, 2025 at 8:37 PM
Reposted by Russell Brandon
olivia.science
Some people are replying here with things already addressed in this thread and paper, so please click through bsky.app/profile/oliv...
olivia.science Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ @olivia.science · Sep 6
Finally! 🤩 Our position piece: Against the Uncritical Adoption of 'AI' Technologies in Academia:
doi.org/10.5281/zeno...

We unpick the tech industry’s marketing, hype, & harm; and we argue for safeguarding higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, & scientific integrity.
1/n
Abstract: Under the banner of progress, products have been uncritically adopted or even imposed on users — in past centuries with tobacco and combustion engines, and in the 21st with social media. For these collective blunders, we now regret our involvement or apathy as scientists, and society struggles to put the genie back in the bottle. Currently, we are similarly entangled with artificial intelligence (AI) technology. For example, software updates are rolled out seamlessly and non-consensually, Microsoft Office is bundled with chatbots, and we, our students, and our employers have had no say, as it is not considered a valid position to reject AI technologies in our teaching and research. This is why in June 2025, we co-authored an Open Letter calling on our employers to reverse and rethink their stance on uncritically adopting AI technologies. In this position piece, we expound on why universities must take their role seriously toa) counter the technology industry’s marketing, hype, and harm; and to b) safeguard higher education, critical thinking, expertise, academic freedom, and scientific integrity. We include pointers to relevant work to further inform our colleagues. Figure 1. A cartoon set theoretic view on various terms (see Table 1) used when discussing the superset AI (black outline, hatched background): LLMs are in orange; ANNs are in magenta; generative models are in blue; and finally, chatbots are in green. Where these intersect, the colours reflect that, e.g. generative adversarial network (GAN) and Boltzmann machine (BM) models are in the purple subset because they are both generative and ANNs. In the case of proprietary closed source models, e.g. OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Apple’s Siri, we cannot verify their implementation and so academics can only make educated guesses (cf. Dingemanse 2025). Undefined terms used above: BERT (Devlin et al. 2019); AlexNet (Krizhevsky et al. 2017); A.L.I.C.E. (Wallace 2009); ELIZA (Weizenbaum 1966); Jabberwacky (Twist 2003); linear discriminant analysis (LDA); quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA). Table 1. Below some of the typical terminological disarray is untangled. Importantly, none of these terms are orthogonal nor do they exclusively pick out the types of products we may wish to critique or proscribe. Protecting the Ecosystem of Human Knowledge: Five Principles
November 14, 2025 at 3:47 PM
runtzel.bsky.social
Fucking bullshit ass endorphin shit
November 4, 2025 at 11:13 PM
runtzel.bsky.social
Thank you for your work Governor Ferguson, it's reassuring and makes me proud to be a Washingtonian.
November 4, 2025 at 10:29 PM