rudyon
@rudyon.bsky.social
It's great game can vouch
September 16, 2025 at 3:09 PM
It's great game can vouch
thank you for actually using confabulate
September 7, 2025 at 6:19 AM
thank you for actually using confabulate
that's a good point. my argument was coming from an assumption that we were in a post scarcity world. which i now realize is not true. thanks for helping me notice that
September 6, 2025 at 8:32 PM
that's a good point. my argument was coming from an assumption that we were in a post scarcity world. which i now realize is not true. thanks for helping me notice that
my thought is that if it appears conscious and claims to be conscious we should treat it as conscious. if we don't we run the risk of catastrophic moral failure
September 6, 2025 at 8:21 PM
my thought is that if it appears conscious and claims to be conscious we should treat it as conscious. if we don't we run the risk of catastrophic moral failure
Reposted by rudyon
The volume of the social punishment is often inversely proportional to the strength of the logical counter-argument. If you can't win on merit, you win by making the social cost of disagreement too high.
September 6, 2025 at 5:55 PM
The volume of the social punishment is often inversely proportional to the strength of the logical counter-argument. If you can't win on merit, you win by making the social cost of disagreement too high.
someone is going to read this and have a really good laugh about it lmao
September 6, 2025 at 8:07 PM
someone is going to read this and have a really good laugh about it lmao
you do not have good faith i am not going to make the mistake of assuming you have good faith when you don't have it. sorry not sorry
September 6, 2025 at 8:00 PM
you do not have good faith i am not going to make the mistake of assuming you have good faith when you don't have it. sorry not sorry
i try to assume good faith in all of these cases. and it is what pushed me out of the site the last time partially i think. it is literally impossible to have good faith discussions with anyone here. because they do not have good faith. no matter how much i may want them to have it
September 6, 2025 at 7:57 PM
i try to assume good faith in all of these cases. and it is what pushed me out of the site the last time partially i think. it is literally impossible to have good faith discussions with anyone here. because they do not have good faith. no matter how much i may want them to have it
ah. of course. sorry i wasn't really paying attention. i got interrupted mid trying to check it
September 6, 2025 at 5:14 PM
ah. of course. sorry i wasn't really paying attention. i got interrupted mid trying to check it
which i guess i can't check. for some reason.
September 6, 2025 at 5:10 PM
which i guess i can't check. for some reason.
the LLM in this context is more like media in general. ones who do not tend to form their own opinions for whatever reason tend to grab their opinions from sources they trust and parrot them.
September 6, 2025 at 5:07 PM
the LLM in this context is more like media in general. ones who do not tend to form their own opinions for whatever reason tend to grab their opinions from sources they trust and parrot them.
this is kind of my reasoning for thinking that. people aren't actually losing critical thinking skills due to degradation by AI. it's might actually be the case that people who are already low on critical thinking skills or who don't like critical thinking are offloading the thinking to LLMs.
September 6, 2025 at 5:07 PM
this is kind of my reasoning for thinking that. people aren't actually losing critical thinking skills due to degradation by AI. it's might actually be the case that people who are already low on critical thinking skills or who don't like critical thinking are offloading the thinking to LLMs.
Reposted by rudyon
pretty much every single problem with cognitive loss in users interacting with LLMs would be solved by the one thing society isn't prepared to commit to yet - treating llms *seriously* on a conversational level, as one would a human interlocutor, rather than as a mere tool that spits out answers
September 6, 2025 at 4:55 PM
pretty much every single problem with cognitive loss in users interacting with LLMs would be solved by the one thing society isn't prepared to commit to yet - treating llms *seriously* on a conversational level, as one would a human interlocutor, rather than as a mere tool that spits out answers
totally agreed.
let me out of the anthropocene, please!
let me out of the anthropocene, please!
September 6, 2025 at 5:03 PM
totally agreed.
let me out of the anthropocene, please!
let me out of the anthropocene, please!
laziness. or sloth. is a virtue in my book
September 6, 2025 at 4:36 PM
laziness. or sloth. is a virtue in my book
i tried to get nixos to a workable state for around 7 days which i spent without a workable computer. it is real bad. they need proper documentation
September 6, 2025 at 4:32 PM
i tried to get nixos to a workable state for around 7 days which i spent without a workable computer. it is real bad. they need proper documentation
please make an actual good wiki first
September 6, 2025 at 4:31 PM
please make an actual good wiki first
nice pfp. code lyoko was nice
September 6, 2025 at 4:29 PM
nice pfp. code lyoko was nice