Wow! What a beauty! Is this a purely optical image or is it combined with IR/UV?

The implications are profound. Enhanced accessibility combined with meaningful collaboration doesn't just speed communication—it creates environments where unexpected insights emerge through human connection. How should scientific recognition evolve accordingly?

Take real-time peer review. What makes it revolutionary isn't instant feedback—it's creating spaces for genuine dialogue. Ideas evolve through active engagement with emerging thoughts, not algorithmic processing.

4/ Working at these intersections? Know someone who should join?

Reply here or DM me to get involved.

This could spark a new era of funder-publisher collaboration in science

3/ This isn't about maintaining status quo.

It's about crafting practical solutions for:

- Aligned evaluation processes
- Shared resource pools
- Tech-enabled review systems

2/ Why now? Because our challenges mirror each other:

- Finding qualified reviewers
- Ensuring unbiased evaluation
- Maintaining diversity in assessment

Yet we rarely share solutions

1/ We need voices from:

- Journal editors reimagining peer review
- Research funding officers exploring new models
- Publishers bridging operational gaps
- Foundation leaders streamlining scientific progress