Oleg Ruсhayskiy
@ruchay.bsky.social
🚀 Astroparticle Physicist | Professor @ Niels Bohr Institute
📚 Co-Founder, CEO of Prophy – Advancing Scientific Knowledge Management
📚 Co-Founder, CEO of Prophy – Advancing Scientific Knowledge Management
Watching publication models evolve has revealed a counterintuitive pattern: while AI transforms peer review, the revolutionary impact isn't technological—it's social.
Real-time feedback isn't powerful because it's instant; it's powerful because it creates space for genuine scientific dialogue.
Real-time feedback isn't powerful because it's instant; it's powerful because it creates space for genuine scientific dialogue.
March 12, 2025 at 9:48 AM
Watching publication models evolve has revealed a counterintuitive pattern: while AI transforms peer review, the revolutionary impact isn't technological—it's social.
Real-time feedback isn't powerful because it's instant; it's powerful because it creates space for genuine scientific dialogue.
Real-time feedback isn't powerful because it's instant; it's powerful because it creates space for genuine scientific dialogue.
The scientific community remains fragmented by specialized languages and isolated expertise.
Our breakthrough moments happen at boundaries, yet we haven't built systematic ways to create these collisions.
Who's working to bridge these divides with you?
Our breakthrough moments happen at boundaries, yet we haven't built systematic ways to create these collisions.
Who's working to bridge these divides with you?
March 7, 2025 at 7:04 PM
The scientific community remains fragmented by specialized languages and isolated expertise.
Our breakthrough moments happen at boundaries, yet we haven't built systematic ways to create these collisions.
Who's working to bridge these divides with you?
Our breakthrough moments happen at boundaries, yet we haven't built systematic ways to create these collisions.
Who's working to bridge these divides with you?
Working between physics and AI, I've repeatedly discovered solutions that existed for years in other fields.
The barrier wasn't knowledge—it was translation
Scientific progress demands not just specialists but interpreters who can bridge these disciplinary divides
The barrier wasn't knowledge—it was translation
Scientific progress demands not just specialists but interpreters who can bridge these disciplinary divides
March 6, 2025 at 11:53 AM
Working between physics and AI, I've repeatedly discovered solutions that existed for years in other fields.
The barrier wasn't knowledge—it was translation
Scientific progress demands not just specialists but interpreters who can bridge these disciplinary divides
The barrier wasn't knowledge—it was translation
Scientific progress demands not just specialists but interpreters who can bridge these disciplinary divides
How is scientific recognition evolving as publishing transforms?
As we shift from gatekeepers to facilitators of scientific conversation, our technological advances aren't replacing human judgment—they're creating environments where unexpected insights emerge through human connection.
As we shift from gatekeepers to facilitators of scientific conversation, our technological advances aren't replacing human judgment—they're creating environments where unexpected insights emerge through human connection.
March 5, 2025 at 1:58 PM
How is scientific recognition evolving as publishing transforms?
As we shift from gatekeepers to facilitators of scientific conversation, our technological advances aren't replacing human judgment—they're creating environments where unexpected insights emerge through human connection.
As we shift from gatekeepers to facilitators of scientific conversation, our technological advances aren't replacing human judgment—they're creating environments where unexpected insights emerge through human connection.
A pattern emerging in academic publishing challenges conventional wisdom: our most powerful technological advances are actually reinforcing the human core of scientific discourse.
The most impactful changes aren't technological—they're social.
The most impactful changes aren't technological—they're social.
March 4, 2025 at 5:27 PM
A pattern emerging in academic publishing challenges conventional wisdom: our most powerful technological advances are actually reinforcing the human core of scientific discourse.
The most impactful changes aren't technological—they're social.
The most impactful changes aren't technological—they're social.
The next big breakthroughs will happen at the intersection of disciplines
We need tools that can identify complementary expertise across fields and facilitate meaningful collaboration
We need tools that can identify complementary expertise across fields and facilitate meaningful collaboration
February 28, 2025 at 1:23 PM
The next big breakthroughs will happen at the intersection of disciplines
We need tools that can identify complementary expertise across fields and facilitate meaningful collaboration
We need tools that can identify complementary expertise across fields and facilitate meaningful collaboration
The gap between research funders and publishers is costing us precious time in scientific advancement.
At the 47th Annual Meeting of the Society for Scholarly Publishing, we're bringing both worlds together to craft a shared vision for 2030.
Want to help shape this future? Read on 🧵
At the 47th Annual Meeting of the Society for Scholarly Publishing, we're bringing both worlds together to craft a shared vision for 2030.
Want to help shape this future? Read on 🧵
February 25, 2025 at 8:12 AM
The gap between research funders and publishers is costing us precious time in scientific advancement.
At the 47th Annual Meeting of the Society for Scholarly Publishing, we're bringing both worlds together to craft a shared vision for 2030.
Want to help shape this future? Read on 🧵
At the 47th Annual Meeting of the Society for Scholarly Publishing, we're bringing both worlds together to craft a shared vision for 2030.
Want to help shape this future? Read on 🧵