Rohan
@rohanps.bsky.social
Macroeconomist specialising in heterogeneous firms. Previously antitrust.
Retired international sportsman / D1 athlete. Englishman in the US. An actual doctor, not one of those fake medical ones.
https://sites.google.com/view/rohan-shah/home
Retired international sportsman / D1 athlete. Englishman in the US. An actual doctor, not one of those fake medical ones.
https://sites.google.com/view/rohan-shah/home
Nope. Rent controls are uniformly bad. You should know this already.
November 16, 2025 at 5:00 PM
Nope. Rent controls are uniformly bad. You should know this already.
Don't need the last two words there 🤷🏽♂️
July 28, 2025 at 1:25 AM
Don't need the last two words there 🤷🏽♂️
I also don't think the dependency ratio (or TFR) is as big a deal as people make it out to be - this is exactly what productivity increases ameliorate!
July 1, 2025 at 10:16 PM
I also don't think the dependency ratio (or TFR) is as big a deal as people make it out to be - this is exactly what productivity increases ameliorate!
Taxes are already far too high as a proportion of gdp as it is!
The correct approach is to cut spending. The coalition had the right idea.
The correct approach is to cut spending. The coalition had the right idea.
July 1, 2025 at 9:38 PM
Taxes are already far too high as a proportion of gdp as it is!
The correct approach is to cut spending. The coalition had the right idea.
The correct approach is to cut spending. The coalition had the right idea.
Disagree - it's far worse without cars and parking.
June 25, 2025 at 11:08 PM
Disagree - it's far worse without cars and parking.
I see Ornstein is doing his usual throwing as many darts as possible at the dartboard and hoping some of them stock. The guy is completely clueless.
June 25, 2025 at 10:37 AM
I see Ornstein is doing his usual throwing as many darts as possible at the dartboard and hoping some of them stock. The guy is completely clueless.
Sounds like you need a new family 👍🏽
June 20, 2025 at 3:46 PM
Sounds like you need a new family 👍🏽
The best time to sack Stearns was before he was hired.
The second best time is now.
The second best time is now.
June 20, 2025 at 3:25 AM
The best time to sack Stearns was before he was hired.
The second best time is now.
The second best time is now.
Not "scammy" at all. You're just jealous of people that are better than you.
May 29, 2025 at 10:01 PM
Not "scammy" at all. You're just jealous of people that are better than you.
And that's why you're just a journalist rather than someone of any importance.
May 27, 2025 at 12:02 PM
And that's why you're just a journalist rather than someone of any importance.
And yet you do neither 🤷🏽♂️
May 26, 2025 at 7:18 PM
And yet you do neither 🤷🏽♂️
Zucman has deliberately misrepresented the data, as he usually does. He cannot be trusted.
May 23, 2025 at 10:10 PM
Zucman has deliberately misrepresented the data, as he usually does. He cannot be trusted.
That just shows up your own ignorance then 🤷🏽♂️
May 18, 2025 at 1:37 PM
That just shows up your own ignorance then 🤷🏽♂️
Your response makes it clear that you don't know anything about economics. You should change that.
May 18, 2025 at 11:58 AM
Your response makes it clear that you don't know anything about economics. You should change that.
Economics is the only true science. Not my fault if you cannot understand this.
May 18, 2025 at 3:38 AM
Economics is the only true science. Not my fault if you cannot understand this.
Peer review is genuinely not a fraud detection mechanism and shouldn't be taken to be. It's not really a knock against a peer review system for failing to pick up when data is faked. The system is already over worked if we did data forensics at scale as a standard part of review it grinds to a halt.
May 18, 2025 at 1:44 AM