Got banned for life from there twice. God I was dreadful.

SCENE: the flat above Abduls

"What time is it? Oh. I have work in three hours" *accepts can of Stella*

Lolz, remember being 24 and thinking we knew what a hangover was?

🚨Not about consultation itself, but linked. Most of this, if not all, can and will be passed via secondary legislation. That means no parliamentary scrutiny or vote. They know they are implementing this no matter how much the evidence already shows the detrimental impact of all these policies. 7/

🚨It isn't unusual for consultations like this, but the limiting factors on the few and far between free form answers doesn't give people the scope to actually explain their own experiences or the issues which would arise from these proposals. 6/

🚨The use of double negatives and switching framing is an old tactic in ensuring that you get the response you want from a consultation rather than the response people want to give, that's really prevalent here. 5/

🚨The questions themselves are clearly designed to get a certain response. In numerous cases you have the option of either saying "Don't know/prefer not to say", or accept the premise that migrants should be penalised and treated as if they are second class. 4/

🚨The supporting consultation document is riddled with errors, misinformation, and flat out lies, all wrapped up in some truly heinous and biased rhetoric. That seems to clearly be to generate a particular response from people who are not deeply aware of the issues in the existing system. 3/

When available, they're on the by-elections tracker electionmaps.uk/byelections-...

Oh I know—majority of 3 (three)! I was refering to the Ashdown and Conquest by-election Mike mentioned in his reply with the Zulu nonsense