🌉 bridged from ⁂ https://mathstodon.xyz/@robinhouston, follow @ap.brid.gy to interact
At least one person read this as an excoriating criticism. It wasn't meant to be! I enjoyed the interview a lot!
At least one person read this as an excoriating criticism. It wasn't meant to be! I enjoyed the interview a lot!
If you have a real symmetric matrix A, and pick some unit vector x, then x.Ax (the Rayleigh quotient) is bounded by the smallest and largest eigenvalues. So what happens if I pick […]
[Original post on mathstodon.xyz]
If you have a real symmetric matrix A, and pick some unit vector x, then x.Ax (the Rayleigh quotient) is bounded by the smallest and largest eigenvalues. So what happens if I pick […]
[Original post on mathstodon.xyz]
It turns out they were just biding their time to drop an 80-page mega-paper describing its use on 67 different problems(!)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.02864
It turns out they were just biding their time to drop an 80-page mega-paper describing its use on 67 different problems(!)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.02864
From https://arxiv.org/pdf/1012.5138, brought to my attention by @liuyao
From https://arxiv.org/pdf/1012.5138, brought to my attention by @liuyao
It seemed an unusual combination to me, but maybe it's not.
It seemed an unusual combination to me, but maybe it's not.
It turns out it was designed by Marc Fornes, who has done a lot of interesting work of that sort. Here's his website: https://theverymany.com/
And a TED talk he gave […]
It turns out it was designed by Marc Fornes, who has done a lot of interesting work of that sort. Here's his website: https://theverymany.com/
And a TED talk he gave […]
If you draw this in a 2×2 matrix, it becomes clear there's one missing.
I propose we refer to the missing type as Type 0 fun: enjoyable at the time but, in retrospect, regrettable.
If you draw this in a 2×2 matrix, it becomes clear there's one missing.
I propose we refer to the missing type as Type 0 fun: enjoyable at the time but, in retrospect, regrettable.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22333
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22333
youtu.be/CROrLQpN6dc
youtu.be/CROrLQpN6dc
Was the 1960s an especially auspicious time for excellent titles?
Was the 1960s an especially auspicious time for excellent titles?
Has anyone seen this one before? (I have more, but this one is conspicuously less weird-looking than most of them.)
Has anyone seen this one before? (I have more, but this one is conspicuously less weird-looking than most of them.)