Rob Mullins
robertmullins.bsky.social
Rob Mullins
@robertmullins.bsky.social
Associate Professor, University of Queensland. My views are not the views of my employer.
Pinned
My article "Does Nature Need Rights?" (coauthored with the wonderful Lulu Weis), forthcoming in the OJLS, is now available open access: academic.oup.com/ojls/advance...
Does Nature Need Rights?
Abstract. Rights of nature (RoN) appear to provide a promising alternative to anthropocentric environmental rights. But do they meet the demands of transfo
academic.oup.com
This is the real scandal. It's happening in real time, with the collaboration of the British establishment. You don't even have to be particularly attentive to see it.
I've been reading about this from an Australian perspective, and it seems very clear that a group of UK journalists, none of them with any apparent medical expertise, have collaborated with a medical old guard to press a false consensus against youth gender medicine.
Emily Maitlis admitting she worked at the bbc to try and get healthcare for trans people shut down
November 10, 2025 at 10:59 PM
I've been reading about this from an Australian perspective, and it seems very clear that a group of UK journalists, none of them with any apparent medical expertise, have collaborated with a medical old guard to press a false consensus against youth gender medicine.
Emily Maitlis admitting she worked at the bbc to try and get healthcare for trans people shut down
November 10, 2025 at 10:52 PM
Reposted by Rob Mullins
Reviewed Sam Tanenhaus's William F. Buckley bio. insidestory.org.au/the-entertai...
The entertaining insurgent • Dominic Kelly
Conservative activist William F. Buckley cajoled America along the road to the Reagan revolution
insidestory.org.au
November 10, 2025 at 5:20 AM
Reposted by Rob Mullins
Ecuador was the first nation to recognise the rights of nature in its constitution in 2008.

If you've been inspired by Ecuador, please sign this open letter below.

url.au.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/xv3lCYWLOx...
Letter of Support: Life Must Come First in Ecuador and Around the World
Life Must Come First in Ecuador and Around the World Ecuador's current constitution is one of the most advanced in the world: it includes rights of nature, the right to water, and collective rights for indigenous peoples who protect valuable ecosystems. This constitution also guarantees various types of consultations that allow citizens to have a say on economic activities with a high environmental impact, such as oil and mining. Ecuadorian President Daniel Noboa, who strongly supports opening up oil extraction and mining in Ecuador, is promoting constitutional change. His government has called a referendum for November 16th so that citizens can decide whether they want to dissolve the existing constitution and have a new one drafted. As researchers, scientists, academics, artists, environmental advocates, and supporters of Indigenous peoples, we express our support for environmental defenders in Ecuador and encourage Ecuadorian citizens to maintain Ecuador's current Constitution and vote No on the call for a constituent assembly. We respect the Ecuadorian people's right to self-determination and their right to decide on their constitution. As people and organisations who have been inspired by the Ecuadorian constitution, we look to the Ecuadorian people to continue to lead the world with the same foresight they displayed in 2008. However, like many people, both in Ecuador and around the world, we are also deeply concerned about the ecological vulnerability that the new constitution could generate by weakening ecosystem protections and prioritizing extractivist economic interests. Right now, the Amazon, the Galapagos Islands, highly biodiverse Andean forests, and other invaluable ecosystems are at grave risk. Ecuador became the first country in the world to recognize rights of nature in its constitution in 2008. Since then, it has served as a beacon of hope and a model for communities worldwide seeking to protect the ecosystems that sustain life. Ecuador's pioneering constitutional framework has inspired hundreds of movements across dozens of countries—from Indigenous communities in North America to municipalities in Europe, from grassroots organizations in Asia to regional governments in Latin America—to pursue similar legal protections in their own jurisdictions. This global movement recognizes what Ecuador enshrined in law: that nature has inherent rights independent of human utility, and that protecting these rights is essential for present and future generations. Ecuador's constitutional innovations have demonstrated that it is possible to build legal systems that place ecological integrity and community rights at the center of governance. The constitution makes clear what the climate and ecological crises on the planet are also making clear: that nature’s rights are everyone’s rights, intertwining humans’ very being with that of the rivers, mountains, and forests. The potential weakening of these protections would represent not only a loss for Ecuadorian people, but a setback for people everywhere seeking to protect their communities in the face of climate change and biodiversity loss. And it represents a huge loss for nature. Last September, Ecuadorian citizens launched a new wave of protests to defend their communities from the ecological, health, and social damages that come with increased extractivism. Ecuador's government has responded with alarming violence. Since protests began in September 2025, reports document more than 282 people injured, 172 detained, 15 temporarily disappeared, and at least three killed in the context of the government's crackdown on environmental and Indigenous protectors. The Ecuadorian government has also begun freezing the bank accounts of more than 60 Indigenous and environmental defenders and organizations, without laying charges or providing legal justification. Activist groups, including Amazon Frontlines and coalitions of Ecuadorian environmental organizations, see these actions as deliberate attempts to silence resistance and enable extractive expansion. These developments reflect a severe and well-documented escalation of repression directed at Ecuadorian citizens defending Ecuador's ecosystems and Indigenous territories from extractive expansion, and they have drawn widespread international attention and condemnation. We join major international organizations and over 120 groups in condemning this repression, in particular the use of militarized policing, force against peaceful protests, and arbitrary financial punishment. We call on Ecuador's government to stop these human rights abuses. Ecuador is one of the countries with the highest biodiversity per square kilometer in the world. Ecuador’s vibrant, diverse ecosystems provide essential benefits to all humanity: they regulate climate, purify water and air, maintain fertile soils, pollinate crops, provide medicines, and support the food systems upon which billions depend. The Amazon rainforest alone generates rainfall that sustains agriculture across South America, stores vast amounts of carbon that helps stabilize global climate, and harbors species that may hold cures for diseases we have yet to understand. The Galapagos Islands serve as a living laboratory for understanding evolution and adaptation in an era of rapid environmental change. These ecosystems are irreplaceable—once destroyed, they cannot be reconstructed, and their loss diminishes the prospects for human wellbeing and survival everywhere. These ecosystems are Life. Life must come first. Signatures:
url.au.m.mimecastprotect.com
November 9, 2025 at 2:21 AM
Reposted by Rob Mullins
We're disappointed to see Ben Barres's powerful book "The Autobiography of a Transgender Scientist" among the ~400 titles removed from the Naval Academy Library. Needless to say, we're proud to have published his book and will keep it — and his memory — alive.
The Coming Out of a Transgender Scientist
"I know that I am making the right decision because whenever I think about changing my gender role, I am flooded with feelings of relief."
thereader.mitpress.mit.edu
April 8, 2025 at 8:24 PM
Reposted by Rob Mullins
We're excited to share the final version of our paper, where we demonstrate how confounding remains a thorny problem for claims about causal genetic influences on human behavioral and socioeconomic outcomes. (w/ @jedidiahcarlson.com @oliviarxiv.bsky.social Ruth Shaw @arbelharpak.bsky.social) 🧵👇
November 7, 2025 at 7:06 PM
Since I am partly to blame for clogging up Spencer's replies, I want to recommend his podcast (with Liv Agar) Science in Transition.
Got some English liberal yelling at me over this so, I would like to state on behalf of my employers: all prison rape is bad, and all prison rape is everyone's problem
it seems like the moderate GC position now is that "Trans women belong in men's prison's but i guess its bad if they get raped"
November 4, 2025 at 8:18 PM
With apologies to those of you who already have had to wade through my draft on FWS, I think this quote from Lord Fraser in Mandela v Dowell Lee (on a biological approach to defining “ethnic origins”) should have served as a warning to the court.
November 4, 2025 at 10:40 AM
I've deleted a previous post about this, which appears to show a KC deadnaming a witness because (i) it repeated the deadname and (ii) I'm not sure whether the KC deadnamed her or the poster did. Apologies to those of you who interacted with it.
October 31, 2025 at 10:33 AM
Reposted by Rob Mullins
This is disastrous; hospices do such important work, not only to give people a good death, but to provide pain management and other services to people with terminal conditions. The staff in hospices work so, so hard and the fact that these institutions depend on charity to operate is a scandal.
October 30, 2025 at 10:09 AM
Thinking about this some more, the Corbett criteria are not *essential* characteristics of sex. They are jointly sufficient characteristics. Any one of them individually can dissociate from sex. E.g. some Corbett-men might have XX chromosomes and some Corbett-women might have XY chromosomes.
Forgive me if someone has discussed this already but this is such a telling passage of FWS. What biological characteristic could a service provider use that would be indissociable from sex?
October 30, 2025 at 7:23 AM
Access to public toilets is a topic that more lawyers and philosophers should write about. (I think we find it too embarrassing ). If there are any natural rights, the right to relieve yourself is just about the most natural right there is.
The Oz running a story that was old hat decades ago. But it appeals prejudices of its audience of ignorant, self-satisfied, bigoted old men. To make the most obvious point, can there be any topic more practical and universally relevant than the need to go to the toilet?

www.theaustralian.co...
1/2
Public toilets, grief in ancient Greece among research taxpayers are funding
From ‘reimagining’ public toilets to preventing AI hallucinations, Australian researchers have secured $376m in government funding for priority research. SUBSCRIBE to read more
www.theaustralian.com.au
October 28, 2025 at 10:14 AM
Reposted by Rob Mullins
A Queensland court has overturned the state government's freeze on puberty blockers. Sanity prevails!!
www.abc.net.au/news/2025-10...
Court overturns Queensland's controversial puberty blocker ban
Queensland controversially barred public doctors from prescribing puberty blockers to patients aged under 18 earlier this year.
www.abc.net.au
October 28, 2025 at 3:28 AM
I'm excited to read this new piece by Aleks Knoks about post-hoc explainability in AI. www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1...
October 27, 2025 at 11:10 PM
The FA’s interpretation of biological sex in FWS is different from the interpretation I would have made. I would have guessed they were invoking the Corbett v Corbett criteria (on which ovaries/testes are not determinative). The Court really should have offered a definition. It is important.
October 26, 2025 at 11:17 AM
Reposted by Rob Mullins
Today is #IntersexAwarenessDay. In Australia, #intersex infants (born with variations of sex characteristics) are still subject to invasive, unnecessary and unconsenting surgical treatment. Every body is beautiful! Visit interaction.org.au for more information about intersex people.
October 25, 2025 at 9:09 PM
Reposted by Rob Mullins
If you're doing *any* out of class assessment, you're incentivizing AI use and harming students who do the work themselves. But some day we have to assess writing again. The solution is monitored computer-labs. What Universities are building these? We need to push for them.
October 22, 2025 at 4:06 PM
Reposted by Rob Mullins
The actual regime that these people are hankering after is Dubai: a small elite of citizens, most immigrants to be transient, insecure and all immigrants to be second-class. In reality they would hate the world they would create and would find ever-more ridiculous scapegoats for their failure.
October 22, 2025 at 10:09 AM
Reposted by Rob Mullins
J'ai du mal à me réjouir de ce qu'un homme dorme en prison, quoi que je pense de lui par ailleurs.

Ceux qui exultent parce qu'ils détestent l'homme ou ses idées m'inspirent les mêmes sentiments que ceux qui crient au scandale.

Ni les uns ni les autres ne sont les amis de l'Etat de droit.
October 21, 2025 at 3:17 PM
There is a strain of 'moderate' gender critical thought, represented by e.g. Mary Leng, Helen Lewis, Karen Monaghan, which insists that we need to recognize a category of sex in law that is trans exclusive but that we can also protect gender identity. I think we are seeing that it won't work.
October 21, 2025 at 8:48 AM
Reposted by Rob Mullins
Intensifying Uni doom loop: the new bureaucracy will eat the higher fees, which just match inflation, and colleagues who can do will leave the profession or go to HE in another country to pursue research, leaving everything increasingly stretched and securing worse and worse outcomes for students.
October 21, 2025 at 7:38 AM
Reposted by Rob Mullins
I’m going to re-up my own piece on BSU. Back in 2022 I wrote that Dalton was the novelist-laureate of Scott Morrison’s Australia. Why is it that readers can’t move on from this guy and his retrograde fantasies? sydneyreviewofbooks.com/reviews/crit...
October 19, 2025 at 9:26 PM
Reposted by Rob Mullins
Proud papa moment: my son J published a letter in the @nytimes.com today (in print tomorrow) on the need to think our definitions of autism.
October 18, 2025 at 8:06 PM
Reposted by Rob Mullins
This graph says it all: instead of starting to go down, the *annual increase* of atmospheric CO2 is setting new records. We're making climate change worse at a record rate.
Turning this around should be our top priority, and it's not.
From: www.carbonbrief.org/met-office-a...
October 18, 2025 at 7:33 PM