Ryuichi Maruyama
@rmaruy.bsky.social
"metascience communicator"
https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryuichimaruyama1987/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryuichimaruyama1987/
Reposted by Ryuichi Maruyama
Thank you to the Long Now Foundation for hosting, to Cayla Sharp and @christophermichel.com for photography, and to everyone who joined this discussion of life and intelligence through a functional lens. View the talk online: bit.ly/3HFVOEI
Blaise Agüera y Arcas: What is Intelligence?
Launched by Stewart Brand in 02003, Long Now Talks has invited more than 400 leading thinkers to share their civilization-scale ideas.
bit.ly
September 22, 2025 at 3:01 PM
Thank you to the Long Now Foundation for hosting, to Cayla Sharp and @christophermichel.com for photography, and to everyone who joined this discussion of life and intelligence through a functional lens. View the talk online: bit.ly/3HFVOEI
Reposted by Ryuichi Maruyama
In "What Is Intelligence?", @blaiseaguera.bsky.social offers a radical new perspective on what intelligence really is, and how AI’s emergence is a natural consequence of evolution. Available #OpenAccess: mitpress.mit.edu/978026204995...
September 23, 2025 at 1:16 PM
In "What Is Intelligence?", @blaiseaguera.bsky.social offers a radical new perspective on what intelligence really is, and how AI’s emergence is a natural consequence of evolution. Available #OpenAccess: mitpress.mit.edu/978026204995...
I'm curious about where discussions on the Metascience of AI in Science are taking place.
September 16, 2025 at 3:02 AM
I'm curious about where discussions on the Metascience of AI in Science are taking place.
Reposted by Ryuichi Maruyama
One challenge in discussing AI’s impact on science is simply how broad the topic is. “AI” is vast, and so is “science.” Hoping to contribute to a meaningful discussion, I’ve sketched a preliminary taxonomy for the discourse on AI in science.
September 12, 2025 at 7:16 AM
One challenge in discussing AI’s impact on science is simply how broad the topic is. “AI” is vast, and so is “science.” Hoping to contribute to a meaningful discussion, I’ve sketched a preliminary taxonomy for the discourse on AI in science.
Reposted by Ryuichi Maruyama
This is my starting point for thinking more deeply about the metascience of AI in science. I’d love to hear people's thoughts!
medium.com/@rmaruy3/a-m...
medium.com/@rmaruy3/a-m...
A Map for the ‘AI in/for Science’ discourse
Is AI opening up a new golden age of science, or is it about to mess it up? On one hand, tech leaders predict that a century’s worth of…
medium.com
September 12, 2025 at 7:17 AM
This is my starting point for thinking more deeply about the metascience of AI in science. I’d love to hear people's thoughts!
medium.com/@rmaruy3/a-m...
medium.com/@rmaruy3/a-m...
This is my starting point for thinking more deeply about the metascience of AI in science. I’d love to hear people's thoughts!
medium.com/@rmaruy3/a-m...
medium.com/@rmaruy3/a-m...
A Map for the ‘AI in/for Science’ discourse
Is AI opening up a new golden age of science, or is it about to mess it up? On one hand, tech leaders predict that a century’s worth of…
medium.com
September 12, 2025 at 7:17 AM
This is my starting point for thinking more deeply about the metascience of AI in science. I’d love to hear people's thoughts!
medium.com/@rmaruy3/a-m...
medium.com/@rmaruy3/a-m...
One challenge in discussing AI’s impact on science is simply how broad the topic is. “AI” is vast, and so is “science.” Hoping to contribute to a meaningful discussion, I’ve sketched a preliminary taxonomy for the discourse on AI in science.
September 12, 2025 at 7:16 AM
One challenge in discussing AI’s impact on science is simply how broad the topic is. “AI” is vast, and so is “science.” Hoping to contribute to a meaningful discussion, I’ve sketched a preliminary taxonomy for the discourse on AI in science.
I suggest we make some kind of taxonomy first... Below is highly work in progress. (I will try to compile a blog post.) There should be pros and cons in each combination.
September 4, 2025 at 12:31 AM
I suggest we make some kind of taxonomy first... Below is highly work in progress. (I will try to compile a blog post.) There should be pros and cons in each combination.
Reposted by Ryuichi Maruyama
You mean biological naturalism? The idea that abstractions are not the same as biological entity, with varying levels of expression in Mazviita Chirimuuta, Peter Godfrey-Smith, John Searle, Ned Block, Anil Seth, the embodied mind authors, among others?
August 21, 2025 at 5:05 PM
You mean biological naturalism? The idea that abstractions are not the same as biological entity, with varying levels of expression in Mazviita Chirimuuta, Peter Godfrey-Smith, John Searle, Ned Block, Anil Seth, the embodied mind authors, among others?
Reposted by Ryuichi Maruyama
He's making AI-as-Death-Star analogy himself. Can't believe it.
August 7, 2025 at 1:23 AM
He's making AI-as-Death-Star analogy himself. Can't believe it.
He's making AI-as-Death-Star analogy himself. Can't believe it.
August 7, 2025 at 1:23 AM
He's making AI-as-Death-Star analogy himself. Can't believe it.