richgillett.bsky.social
@richgillett.bsky.social
Reposted
Wanting to be "productive", we may spend much time in "doing" mode (achieving goals & checking items off lists). Might be better in "spacious" mode (pausing to see multiple possibilities, make wiser decisions, build relationships):
hbr.org/2025/02/how-.... By Megan Reitz. Art: lianafinck.bsky.social
February 16, 2025 at 10:45 AM
Reposted
Every week, I see a new study talking about this or that effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists like #ozempic. FINALLY, we have a study evaluating all the outcomes (good and bad) in one dataset. There are some... surprises. 🧵
January 22, 2025 at 9:33 PM
Reposted
Anita Charlesworth on the NHS:
-NHS confuses cost cutting with productivity improvement
-NHS is "uncoordinated system that doesn’t work for the people, staff or the taxpayer"

www.hsj.co.uk/finance-and-...
NHS ‘too focused on cost-cutting, not productivity’
The NHS's efforts to maximise productivity have been characterised by cost-cutting, rather than a coherent long-term strategy, a leading health economist has said.
www.hsj.co.uk
January 31, 2025 at 10:17 AM
Reposted
What should the early lines of code written during a new outbreak look like? We've got a new viewpoint piece in Lancet Digital Health on how to improve early outbreak analytics, with a great group of contributors: linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii...
January 10, 2025 at 10:54 AM
Reposted
"Busyness" is an affliction for many of us. It often fulfils a deep need but means no time for things that really matter to us. We can make 2025 the year when, individually & collectively, we're less "busy". See: medtrics.org/why-do-we-al... by Dalia Oufi. Art: Liana Finck via adamgrant.bsky.social
January 3, 2025 at 11:14 AM
Reposted
How can we effectively incorporate equity into quality improvement and patient safety?

Should there be more projects focused specifically on equity, or should equity be embedded into all quality improvement?

BMJ Quality & Safety editorial bit.ly/4f6BsPG #PtSafety
Taking action on inequities: a structural paradigm for quality and safety
As quality improvement and patient safety (QIPS) practitioners, we aspire to improve care for all patients, caregivers and families using improvement methods. While teams are trained to carefully impl...
bit.ly
December 2, 2024 at 11:06 AM
Reposted
Quality and safety of artificial intelligence generated health information www.bmj.com/content/...

Given that more than 70% of people turn to the internet as their first source of health information, it is crucial to identify common types of risks associated with AI technologies...

#AI #BMJ #
Quality and safety of artificial intelligence generated health information
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is advancing rapidly and has the potential to greatly improve many aspects of society, including health. The risks of potentially harmful consequences, however, necessitate effective oversight and mitigation measures. This article highlights distinct forms of health related risks of generative AI, with corresponding options for mitigating risk. Although artificial intelligence (AI) holds considerable promise for positive effects on society, it also has the potential for harmful consequences, which may occur either unintentionally or because of misuse. Applications, such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Midjourney, and Sora, showcase generative AI’s capability to create high quality text, audio, video, and image content. The rapid advancement of AI technologies requires an equally rapid escalation of efforts to identify and mitigate risks. New disciplines, such as AI Safety and Ethical AI, broadly aim to ensure that current and future AI operates in a manner that is safe and ethical. This article focuses on generative AI—a technology with substantial potential to transform how communities seek, access, and communicate information, including about health. Table 1 outlines a glossary of key terms used in the article. Given that more than 70% of people turn to the internet as their first source of health information,1 it is crucial to identify common types of risks associated with AI technologies and to introduce effective vigilance structures for mitigating these risks. Notably, as generative AI becomes increasingly sophisticated, it will become more challenging for the public to discern when outputs (text, audio, video) are incorrect. In this article, we aim to differentiate common types of potential risks and highlight emerging ideas for mitigating each type of risk. For simplicity, we often use large language models (LLMs) to illustrate emerging …
www.bmj.com
March 25, 2024 at 6:38 PM
Reposted
We wish we could eradicate ‘just a’ from NHS vocabulary.

Every single person plays their part, and it couldn’t happen without everyone.
November 24, 2024 at 11:09 AM