Richard Head 🤔😶😕🤨
@richardsbighead.bsky.social
A sucker is someone who voted for Trump once, a loser is someone who'd do it twice.
The Dems don't have the guts to do it tho, that's the main problem.
December 26, 2025 at 3:38 AM
The Dems don't have the guts to do it tho, that's the main problem.
What does it say about Biden in the fact that he never even threatened to fire/replace Garland despite his blatant incompetency. Or even about Obama, Trump was no less of a criminal then, and Obama/Holder did nothing about it either. Just one felony conviction could have stopped all of this, but no.
December 25, 2025 at 4:20 PM
What does it say about Biden in the fact that he never even threatened to fire/replace Garland despite his blatant incompetency. Or even about Obama, Trump was no less of a criminal then, and Obama/Holder did nothing about it either. Just one felony conviction could have stopped all of this, but no.
The additional problem is; we're not at war by any legal definition.
December 7, 2025 at 3:18 PM
The additional problem is; we're not at war by any legal definition.
Dem cowards too. Trump was a criminal when Obama was President, and all Obama did was mock him with a birth cert mug, instead of nailing him on the Epstein stuff. All it would have taken is 1 felony conviction anytime in the past, and Trump wouldn't have been elected to anything. But noooo.
December 3, 2025 at 4:06 AM
Dem cowards too. Trump was a criminal when Obama was President, and all Obama did was mock him with a birth cert mug, instead of nailing him on the Epstein stuff. All it would have taken is 1 felony conviction anytime in the past, and Trump wouldn't have been elected to anything. But noooo.
Reposted by Richard Head 🤔😶😕🤨
something is happening and needs details & confirmation, or to rule something out.
If he has had several in succession, that is to track and monitor what’s happening, not to prevent something from happening.
If he has had several in succession, that is to track and monitor what’s happening, not to prevent something from happening.
December 1, 2025 at 11:18 PM
something is happening and needs details & confirmation, or to rule something out.
If he has had several in succession, that is to track and monitor what’s happening, not to prevent something from happening.
If he has had several in succession, that is to track and monitor what’s happening, not to prevent something from happening.
Reposted by Richard Head 🤔😶😕🤨
If only you & Holder would have gone after the Trump Crime Syndicate for any of the Epstein stuff, we wouldn't be here right now. Your failures brought us to this point. Just 1 felony conviction would have stopped this, but no, instead you had to tease him with a birth cert. mug. That showed him!
November 27, 2025 at 5:39 PM
If only you & Holder would have gone after the Trump Crime Syndicate for any of the Epstein stuff, we wouldn't be here right now. Your failures brought us to this point. Just 1 felony conviction would have stopped this, but no, instead you had to tease him with a birth cert. mug. That showed him!
If only you & Holder would have gone after the Trump Crime Syndicate for any of the Epstein stuff, we wouldn't be here right now. Your failures brought us to this point. Just 1 felony conviction would have stopped this, but no, instead you had to tease him with a birth cert. mug. That showed him!
November 27, 2025 at 5:39 PM
If only you & Holder would have gone after the Trump Crime Syndicate for any of the Epstein stuff, we wouldn't be here right now. Your failures brought us to this point. Just 1 felony conviction would have stopped this, but no, instead you had to tease him with a birth cert. mug. That showed him!
Not as bad as it should, even if that includes prison time.
November 27, 2025 at 12:35 AM
Not as bad as it should, even if that includes prison time.
They'll reshoot the movie to change that outcome.
November 25, 2025 at 3:13 AM
They'll reshoot the movie to change that outcome.
And if they actually do, it will go absolutely... Nowhere.
Prove me wrong!
Prove me wrong!
November 21, 2025 at 3:33 PM
And if they actually do, it will go absolutely... Nowhere.
Prove me wrong!
Prove me wrong!
Having seen you in Denver and countless TV performances, I can't understand why you'd be THAT nervous? This is your wheelhouse! There are very few people who can command a stage & audience like you do. There is certainly no shortage of topics to talk about. You'll do great as always! Break a leg!
November 19, 2025 at 2:43 PM
Having seen you in Denver and countless TV performances, I can't understand why you'd be THAT nervous? This is your wheelhouse! There are very few people who can command a stage & audience like you do. There is certainly no shortage of topics to talk about. You'll do great as always! Break a leg!
Reposted by Richard Head 🤔😶😕🤨
What’s unusual is that this isn’t the normal behavior. Typically PIA changes go to a new, unused code. This is the second time I’ve seen the FAA (or possibly Musk’s team) recycle previous ones instead of assigning a fresh code, which has to be accounted for.
November 19, 2025 at 4:20 AM
What’s unusual is that this isn’t the normal behavior. Typically PIA changes go to a new, unused code. This is the second time I’ve seen the FAA (or possibly Musk’s team) recycle previous ones instead of assigning a fresh code, which has to be accounted for.
Wadda ya mean no way out? They'll just lie like they always do and their repogramable meatbag voters will simply blink and go on as if they were never involved.
November 14, 2025 at 12:30 AM
Wadda ya mean no way out? They'll just lie like they always do and their repogramable meatbag voters will simply blink and go on as if they were never involved.
Ok, but what is she going to accomplish that gives the Right Wing Crime Syndicate reason to fear her?
November 14, 2025 at 12:25 AM
Ok, but what is she going to accomplish that gives the Right Wing Crime Syndicate reason to fear her?
The only reason you might be wrong is, it needs to be more than that. It should be what you or I pay percentage-wise. Never any less than 25% tho.
November 11, 2025 at 4:08 AM
The only reason you might be wrong is, it needs to be more than that. It should be what you or I pay percentage-wise. Never any less than 25% tho.
Except for people like Muellershewrote and others who blocked anyone/everyone who said Garland was going "playing 3D Chess" & and we "don't know what we're talking about" or "be patient, these things take time" or the ever popular "your not a lawyer"... Yada yada yada.
They're out there, trust me.
They're out there, trust me.
November 11, 2025 at 2:54 AM
Except for people like Muellershewrote and others who blocked anyone/everyone who said Garland was going "playing 3D Chess" & and we "don't know what we're talking about" or "be patient, these things take time" or the ever popular "your not a lawyer"... Yada yada yada.
They're out there, trust me.
They're out there, trust me.
Right there with ya.
And honestly, I'm not that thrilled that Obama did nothing to go after the Trump crime syndicate, except mock him with a birth cert on a mug. That really showed Trump, didn't it? He was no less of a criminal then, and Obama & Holder did nothing to make him a convicted felon.
And honestly, I'm not that thrilled that Obama did nothing to go after the Trump crime syndicate, except mock him with a birth cert on a mug. That really showed Trump, didn't it? He was no less of a criminal then, and Obama & Holder did nothing to make him a convicted felon.
November 11, 2025 at 2:44 AM
Right there with ya.
And honestly, I'm not that thrilled that Obama did nothing to go after the Trump crime syndicate, except mock him with a birth cert on a mug. That really showed Trump, didn't it? He was no less of a criminal then, and Obama & Holder did nothing to make him a convicted felon.
And honestly, I'm not that thrilled that Obama did nothing to go after the Trump crime syndicate, except mock him with a birth cert on a mug. That really showed Trump, didn't it? He was no less of a criminal then, and Obama & Holder did nothing to make him a convicted felon.