Yes. Up there with “fuel poor”

Or perhaps those who keep giving oxygen to this.

It’s such a funny world that in the old days, to win the election you had to move towards the centre but now you have to move to the silly zone because so much of the action seems to be taking place there.

BTW - good to see you here and not on the Musk machine.

We should all discuss and debate more calmly how as we move away from the economics of gas setting price most of time to zero marginal cost most of time, economic system should change. Have not yet seen a willingness to do that and that is all our loss.

I am not looking for system to remain as is but has been disappointing that inconvenient truths like CoC are ignored and “vested interest” labels are bandied around by some - who err, often have vested interests.

We can also agree that neither sharper TNUOS nor Nodal are needed to tell us there is a big constraint between England and Scotland

We have both agreed for some time that central planning is not great but it’s also not true that any other system is better…. just because it’s not central planning.

Happy with sharper TNUOS. Pretty much every report shows even a relatively small change in CoC wipes out the perceived benefits of Nodal. Usually, IMO, there is no acceptance of this by proponents of Nodal. Or if they do, no acceptance that the increased uncertainty of future revenues increases CoC.