Richard Stack
banner
richardkstack.bsky.social
Richard Stack
@richardkstack.bsky.social
https://www.richardkstack.com/

I write code, DM for friends, and make games (Godot obsessed atm). Also down to talk improv and standup!

My passion could change tomorrow, and that's the way I like it. For now.

Trying to be relatable is a trap.
I've been following your studio since the first Greedfall, which I enjoyed immensely. Although I'm giving this game some more time to cook, I've bought it and am following it closely. I'm excited to see where you guys go next! ❤️
November 15, 2025 at 5:36 PM
Pose those cats in a circle! 🎵
November 12, 2025 at 5:12 PM
Making them innately evil is a quick and dirty way to create conflict, so it's a popular solution.
October 13, 2025 at 4:40 PM
Games require way more filler than written fiction. This is when fodder becomes necessary. But enemy monsters who are only monstrous and non-sentient eventually become boring, and so it's fun to throw in species capable of using a bit of tactics...
October 13, 2025 at 4:39 PM
It's so common for combat mechanics to be designed separately from roleplaying mechanics. If the game has lots of combat, you need lots of stuff to kill and to kill often, so thinking about whether it's ethical to kill them or not every time becomes monotonous...
October 13, 2025 at 4:39 PM
I'm happy you're happy.
September 28, 2025 at 7:42 PM
I assume this is because we use humans as a default, and other fantasy races are defined by their differences from humans. Humans but they live much longer and have pointed ears? Elves. Humans but they have green or grey skin and tusks? Orcs. Etcetera.
September 21, 2025 at 11:00 PM
Even better - build your own fucking table.
August 4, 2025 at 3:32 PM
With this thought, I was more interested in exploring how humanity invents languages (like math) to describe the universe in ways that make sense to us, but may not make sense outside of human perception. This "shower thought" is meant to be more philosophical than pragmatic.
July 16, 2025 at 4:26 PM
Sure. I'm more talking about how, out of necessity, math is based around various axioms (aka assumptions). One such axiom is what "1" means. We all agree on it, and base higher mathematics around it, but "1" is not a concept that exists in the universe without human perception.
July 16, 2025 at 4:24 PM
To me the "objective" reality is what exists without human perception. Even the simple concept of counting objects is subjective. You can count two objects, and they may still exist whether you were there or not, but to count them you still defined what an "object" was, and that's subjective.
July 8, 2025 at 1:13 AM
That's #Fate the video game for those curious.
July 1, 2025 at 12:10 AM