If you care about the macroeconomics of climate transition, check it out:
📄 “Forward guidance in climate policy”
By Riccardo Degasperi, Filippo Natoli, Valerio Nispi Landi, and Kevin Pallara
🧾 tinyurl.com/68jsub5j
🌱💸📉
If you care about the macroeconomics of climate transition, check it out:
📄 “Forward guidance in climate policy”
By Riccardo Degasperi, Filippo Natoli, Valerio Nispi Landi, and Kevin Pallara
🧾 tinyurl.com/68jsub5j
🌱💸📉
Methodologically, we:
✔️ Extend Känzig (2023)’s EU ETS event dataset
✔️ Use surprises in carbon and critical metals futures
✔️ Identify shocks via Proxy-SVARs and sign restrictions
✔️ Run Structural Scenario Analyses
✔️ Validate using a structural DSGE
Methodologically, we:
✔️ Extend Känzig (2023)’s EU ETS event dataset
✔️ Use surprises in carbon and critical metals futures
✔️ Identify shocks via Proxy-SVARs and sign restrictions
✔️ Run Structural Scenario Analyses
✔️ Validate using a structural DSGE
This tells us that 𝗰𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰𝘆 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗴𝘂𝗶𝗱𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲
🏦 Can be an important policy tool
🌍 It affects macro outcomes and expectations
🌱 It can accelerate the transition
✅…without causing inflation
This tells us that 𝗰𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰𝘆 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗴𝘂𝗶𝗱𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲
🏦 Can be an important policy tool
🌍 It affects macro outcomes and expectations
🌱 It can accelerate the transition
✅…without causing inflation
𝗞𝗲𝘆 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝟯
Path shocks affect climate-related expectations:
♻️ Investors rebalance toward greener assets
🛡️ Perceived climate risks fall
📉 Growth and consumption expectations fall
📈 Financial uncertainty rises
𝗞𝗲𝘆 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝟯
Path shocks affect climate-related expectations:
♻️ Investors rebalance toward greener assets
🛡️ Perceived climate risks fall
📉 Growth and consumption expectations fall
📈 Financial uncertainty rises
𝗞𝗲𝘆 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝟮
🏦 Monetary policy eases after a path shock.
✅ No trade-off, as inflation and output both fall.
In a structural counterfactual with no monetary easing,
➡️ emissions drop 3x more
➡️ output and prices drop 2x more
𝗞𝗲𝘆 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝟮
🏦 Monetary policy eases after a path shock.
✅ No trade-off, as inflation and output both fall.
In a structural counterfactual with no monetary easing,
➡️ emissions drop 3x more
➡️ output and prices drop 2x more
We back this up with an environmental DSGE model featuring:
🏭 green vs brown firms
💸 carbon taxes
🏦 monetary policy
The model reproduces the same inflation dynamics:
🔹 Stance shock = cost-push shock
🔹 Path shock = demand shock
We back this up with an environmental DSGE model featuring:
🏭 green vs brown firms
💸 carbon taxes
🏦 monetary policy
The model reproduces the same inflation dynamics:
🔹 Stance shock = cost-push shock
🔹 Path shock = demand shock
Why is a path shock deflationary?
🔻 Households expect lower future income
➡️ reduce consumption today 🧺
📉 Aggregate demand falls more than supply
➡️ Inflation declines
Why is a path shock deflationary?
🔻 Households expect lower future income
➡️ reduce consumption today 🧺
📉 Aggregate demand falls more than supply
➡️ Inflation declines
Think of path shocks as 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗴𝘂𝗶𝗱𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 on climate policy.
𝗞𝗲𝘆 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝟭
🔹 Both shocks reduce emissions and output
🔹 But they have opposite effects on inflation:
⚠️ Current stance → inflationary (cost-push)
🌱 Path shock → deflationary (demand-driven)
Think of path shocks as 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗴𝘂𝗶𝗱𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 on climate policy.
𝗞𝗲𝘆 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝟭
🔹 Both shocks reduce emissions and output
🔹 But they have opposite effects on inflation:
⚠️ Current stance → inflationary (cost-push)
🌱 Path shock → deflationary (demand-driven)
We exploit high-frequency surprises in carbon futures, critical minerals, and stock prices around announcements in the EU ETS
Our goal: disentangle
✅ “Current stance” shocks: changes in current carbon policy
✅ “Path” shocks: changes in future trajectory of carbon policy
We exploit high-frequency surprises in carbon futures, critical minerals, and stock prices around announcements in the EU ETS
Our goal: disentangle
✅ “Current stance” shocks: changes in current carbon policy
✅ “Path” shocks: changes in future trajectory of carbon policy