perceiven’t 🫥🫥🫥
@retroflexin.bsky.social
[they/them]
chronically fatigued Black punk dyke. low tolerance for dumbassery. green thumb, dog father, avid reader, gamer, archer, & Official Linguist™
chronically fatigued Black punk dyke. low tolerance for dumbassery. green thumb, dog father, avid reader, gamer, archer, & Official Linguist™
was looking over some of the papers n whatnot i did for my MA & i wrote a squib about the semantics of “fuck” but thee funniest thing i got away with was arbitrarily renaming the two distinct functions of the verb to “fuck cop” and “fuck dis”
![[Cawley deems a ‘quasi-verb’, a kind of epithet that indicated the speaker’s attitude towards either the attached noun phrase or an unspecified object.] For clarity’s sake, I will refer to “fuck 1” as “fuck cop” as in “copulative fuck” and “fuck 2” as “fuck dis” for “disapproving fuck”.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:7ojvvg73tss3mgustqqze2lh/bafkreiga4qbnykwl6cixmo7qv66hy5pp4anulpqy2tctokoy7ygdrjy4zi@jpeg)
March 11, 2025 at 3:47 PM
was looking over some of the papers n whatnot i did for my MA & i wrote a squib about the semantics of “fuck” but thee funniest thing i got away with was arbitrarily renaming the two distinct functions of the verb to “fuck cop” and “fuck dis”
it will transcribe roughly 60% of the interview and then abruptly switches to “why are you doing this to me” (a sentence which is NOT in the source audio), repeating it a good 30, 40 times before just. ending the transcript
January 7, 2025 at 10:08 PM
it will transcribe roughly 60% of the interview and then abruptly switches to “why are you doing this to me” (a sentence which is NOT in the source audio), repeating it a good 30, 40 times before just. ending the transcript