None of this information is accurate at all. Don’t believe memes that you don’t fact check. The US is ranked 5th in literacy rates.

We see this now with the formation of worker co-ops, time and food banks, bartering systems, tenant unions, etc. Capitalism’s contradictions have become so great that the proletariat is finding alternative means of survival outside of capitalism itself, transitioning to a new system in the process.

Essentially, rather than an abrupt revolutionary overthrow of the current socioeconomic system, the aggrieved masses begin organizing to form a parallel socioeconomic system that better meets their needs, eventually rendering the previous socioeconomic system “redundant.”

By “redundancy-based transition” I mean that as a hierarchical socioeconomic system grows in its contradictions and fails to meet the needs of the masses (serfs, proletariat, etc.), the masses form a new socioeconomic system out of necessity.

I get that you’re deeply hurt and upset and honestly I don’t blame you at all. I just don’t want you or anyone to get left behind. We all deserve a place in this world and the ability to survive, especially minorities and those most vulnerable.

It’s not about sitting it out, but about adapting to a new kind of resistance where mutual support becomes the foundation of survival. It’s difficult, and I understand the frustration, but the people who are fighting the system don’t have to be alone in it.

I hear you, and I respect the work you’ve done in fighting for equality—it’s been a hard road. I’m not trying to dismiss the struggle you’ve faced. What I’m suggesting is that, as things get harder, finding ways to support each other collectively could be key to surviving what’s coming.

I’m trying to say that the transition to post-capitalist society is already underway because, out of necessity, people are building community networks outside the bounds of capitalism. You really don’t have the option to sit it out because survival in post-capitalism is about collective cooperation.

I think OP meant that given that the nature of crypto encourages Ponzi scheme behavior, if 99% of crypto is a Ponzi scheme, then it stands to reason bitcoin is also a Ponzi scheme.

That’s a statistical concept called conditional probability.

Because women are less impulsive and more methodical in their thinking. What’s your point?

I’m just a student, but I’ve had this idea mulling about for a while in my head as I connected the dots of patterns in past social systems, the history of capitalism, observations of where we are today, and relevant social theories. I figured I should write it all down so others can contribute.

The basic premise of my theory deals with the historical acceleration of class hierarchies, a redundancy-based transition to new social structures, and the framing of class-based societies as anomalies in the span of human history.