@repete1970.bsky.social
To me, the people who love this show are people who were determined to love this show before they watched a minute of it.
December 24, 2025 at 9:22 AM
To me, the people who love this show are people who were determined to love this show before they watched a minute of it.
And specifically a very unlikable main character.
December 24, 2025 at 9:21 AM
And specifically a very unlikable main character.
two game suspension would be fair
December 22, 2025 at 4:35 AM
two game suspension would be fair
incredibly dislikable
December 20, 2025 at 6:20 AM
incredibly dislikable
What recourse is there?
December 20, 2025 at 6:19 AM
What recourse is there?
It's a very annoying show. Incredibly self-important. Instant turnoff.
December 20, 2025 at 6:18 AM
It's a very annoying show. Incredibly self-important. Instant turnoff.
I will die on this hill with you. I find it unserious and borderline unwatchable at times.
December 20, 2025 at 6:12 AM
I will die on this hill with you. I find it unserious and borderline unwatchable at times.
guessing legacy admit
September 19, 2025 at 5:27 AM
guessing legacy admit
With all that is going on in the U.S./world, THIS is the "scandal of the summer"? (it's not)
September 1, 2025 at 2:44 AM
With all that is going on in the U.S./world, THIS is the "scandal of the summer"? (it's not)
You know Dan, I appreciate you continuing to post here, even though I'm sure you get a small fraction of the engagement you get on Twitter. But I appreciate it.
July 4, 2025 at 6:53 AM
You know Dan, I appreciate you continuing to post here, even though I'm sure you get a small fraction of the engagement you get on Twitter. But I appreciate it.
The question wasn't "Should the U.S. have bombed Iran?" You're equating two largely separate questions as if they were the same thing, and they're not.
June 23, 2025 at 6:11 AM
The question wasn't "Should the U.S. have bombed Iran?" You're equating two largely separate questions as if they were the same thing, and they're not.
Of course Iran has a nuclear weapons program, and nothing about the current situation is similar to Iraq. There's no credible peaceful use for 60% enriched uranium, being enriched in fortified bunkers a half mile underground. Embarrassing.
June 18, 2025 at 10:51 PM
Of course Iran has a nuclear weapons program, and nothing about the current situation is similar to Iraq. There's no credible peaceful use for 60% enriched uranium, being enriched in fortified bunkers a half mile underground. Embarrassing.
And how's that strategy working out for Iran right now? Also what would it look like if Iran had given up its obsession with destroying Israel for the last 50 years and instead focused on bettering the lives of everyday Iranians?
June 18, 2025 at 6:01 AM
And how's that strategy working out for Iran right now? Also what would it look like if Iran had given up its obsession with destroying Israel for the last 50 years and instead focused on bettering the lives of everyday Iranians?
What non-military use is there for 60% enriched uranium?
June 18, 2025 at 5:49 AM
What non-military use is there for 60% enriched uranium?
The Iran collateral human casualties are many orders of magnitude lower than the 500K number you brought up with a nonsensical and irrelevant historical comparison from decades ago...
...because it's easier to argue that number rather than the actual total. Definitionally a strawman.
...because it's easier to argue that number rather than the actual total. Definitionally a strawman.
June 18, 2025 at 3:37 AM
The Iran collateral human casualties are many orders of magnitude lower than the 500K number you brought up with a nonsensical and irrelevant historical comparison from decades ago...
...because it's easier to argue that number rather than the actual total. Definitionally a strawman.
...because it's easier to argue that number rather than the actual total. Definitionally a strawman.
Do we have 500K dead Iranians? Again, you like arguing against strawmen, presumably because arguing against reality is less persuasive.
June 18, 2025 at 3:21 AM
Do we have 500K dead Iranians? Again, you like arguing against strawmen, presumably because arguing against reality is less persuasive.
Unless said argument is which city has the larger population.
June 18, 2025 at 3:14 AM
Unless said argument is which city has the larger population.
"People" are not being bombed, with strategic exceptions. Weapons and infrastructure are being bombed, obviously with collateral human causalities.
My question--and my only question--was why Wajahat views it as a blunder.
Also, the population of Tehran vs NYC is immaterial to any argument.
My question--and my only question--was why Wajahat views it as a blunder.
Also, the population of Tehran vs NYC is immaterial to any argument.
June 18, 2025 at 3:13 AM
"People" are not being bombed, with strategic exceptions. Weapons and infrastructure are being bombed, obviously with collateral human causalities.
My question--and my only question--was why Wajahat views it as a blunder.
Also, the population of Tehran vs NYC is immaterial to any argument.
My question--and my only question--was why Wajahat views it as a blunder.
Also, the population of Tehran vs NYC is immaterial to any argument.