rennfairechef.bsky.social
@rennfairechef.bsky.social
Retied Chef, Information Gatherer, and Rennfaire Enthusiast #tiktokrefugee
100% correct.
January 21, 2025 at 3:47 PM
I thought it was political theatre from the moment Trump did a 180 and supported saying tiktoc. He never does that unless it benefits him.
January 19, 2025 at 6:05 PM
Actually, I did, and now I am thinking about primarying him. He is so out of touch with his constituency.
January 19, 2025 at 2:16 PM
Reposted
My sketchy landlord raised our rents yesterday by posting the increases publicly on our doors.
January 17, 2025 at 6:38 PM
Oh, good idea
January 19, 2025 at 4:41 AM
Lol. OK, that was funny and understandable.😁
January 19, 2025 at 4:11 AM
True.
January 19, 2025 at 4:05 AM
True, but I extremely rarely refer to anything like those mentioned by a particular president's name since I know it takes more than one person to pass and uphold legislation. (Well, except Reaganomics, and only sometimes.) Guess I am weird that way
January 19, 2025 at 4:05 AM
Nor should he, but with such bipartisan support to.pass the legislation in the Congess and a Uniamnious SCOTUS Opinion to support, it is the whole.ofnthe government, not just Biden. That tradition doesn't apply.
January 19, 2025 at 3:56 AM
This is not Biden's tiktok ban. This whole process began July of 2020 with Trump saying he wanted to ban it and MAGA and Freedom Caucus latching on. In the end, it turned out the whole federal government wanted it. Biden played his role, just like Congress, and just like SCOTUS.
January 19, 2025 at 3:51 AM
This wasn't just Biden. Sure, he was a part of it, and I give him his share of the blame. This was the whole of the federal government, and this whole thing started with Trump wanting to ban tiktok in July 2020.
January 19, 2025 at 3:47 AM