Apparently keeping promises is difficult without concrete rewards. We should change the incentive stucture to do so

Great teaching case! On the Bad Science Bingo Card 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 31, and 36 are strong contenders for a prize for this article detectingbadscience.wordpress.com/bad-science-...

👏

Thanks for mentioning it! Indeed it's a teaching tool. Each entry is a risk factor, but some are worse than others and their weights will vary from case to case. The website gives some meta science insights for each issue, and recommends a fix

A good systematic review/meta analysis will evaluate the quality of each study and not just review the conclusions/data.

If the methodology doesn't include evaluation of quality, it's not a good source. Reviewing methodology is part of the vetting process.