Ree
banner
ree81.bsky.social
Ree
@ree81.bsky.social
I believe we have the wrong DNA profile to run a civilization.

Pic is from Paradise, the town that burned down.
Samma uppe i norr. Det här är värre än 2018.
July 27, 2025 at 11:39 PM
Don't feed the trolls. He's a well known spreader of climate denial. A monster, if you ask me.
June 23, 2025 at 12:59 PM
Of course your timeline is riddled with AI art lol. Loser.
June 23, 2025 at 12:58 PM
You. You're a goddamn monster. You have no problem taking oil money to peddly conspiracies and disinformation.

Stop talking to real scientists you hack.

In fact, log off the internet completely. Never return.
June 23, 2025 at 12:57 PM
Ah, plain cowardice then.
June 23, 2025 at 12:55 PM
Well, at least the human emissions are going to virtually flat-line around 2045-2050 or so.
May 27, 2025 at 1:45 PM
No, you do witch comics only now.

Stop trying to be a good person and have ... *ugh* ..."diversity in your portfolio". Just give people what they want. Buff anthro women.

;)
May 18, 2025 at 2:35 PM
Lol

Lmao
May 14, 2025 at 12:11 PM
Nyoooohhh~ you're being too dramatic!!11 1.5C won't *end the world* and you're bad for spreading that opinion! DOOMERS BAD!

(Nobody's really doing that, and if they spread anything it's that "we're hitting 1.5C way too fast, meaning we'll shoot right into apocalyptic territory")
May 12, 2025 at 8:08 PM
Tyvärr verkar han ha gett upp hoppet en hel del. Han låter frustrerad i hans senaste.... tror det var ett "Ted talk" (kan ha fel), som dök upp på youtube för några månader sen.

Frekvensen av gångerna han dyker upp i media, och även på sociala medier, verkar ha gått ner. Det är för att läget är....
May 12, 2025 at 12:38 PM
Skrev inte "kritik". Skrev desinformation.

Men men, du verkar vara ytterst stel i ditt tänkande. Hoppas jag aldrig blir så när jag blir gammal.
May 12, 2025 at 12:35 PM
The short answer is: Human beings lack foresight. Yes we "can" do it, but most of us simply don't. If you weren't *FORCED* to save up for pension, 98% of us wouldn't, period.

A study showed that our "emotional attachment" to our future self is about as high as a random stranger dying of thirst tody
May 12, 2025 at 11:40 AM
Hot conspiracy take: He's trying to crash the global economy by accelerationism, thus minimizing damage by capitalism before it's literally too late.
May 12, 2025 at 11:38 AM
Reposted by Ree
It's by design (pic). Turns out, if you give rich people power, it's game over.

Oops, media is all owned by rich people, rather than a (for example) government funded but separate news organization that has a clear goal of prioritizing what's important for society, as well as holding up truth etc.
May 12, 2025 at 11:37 AM
It's by design (pic). Turns out, if you give rich people power, it's game over.

Oops, media is all owned by rich people, rather than a (for example) government funded but separate news organization that has a clear goal of prioritizing what's important for society, as well as holding up truth etc.
May 12, 2025 at 11:37 AM
Du svarade inte på frågan.

Varför ska det ena vara olagligt men inte det andra? Båda är samhällsskadliga som tusan.
May 12, 2025 at 11:32 AM
"Ah base my entire personality on the slogan 'Ya can't take muh car!'"
May 12, 2025 at 11:27 AM
I had no idea what "Ofcom" was because I'm not from the UK, but apparently they're some sort of regulation, yes.

But, in a neoliberal society where the rich have *ALL* the power, obviously someone who gets their paycheck from these assholes are going to be kept on a tight leash.
May 12, 2025 at 11:22 AM
Så vad är skillnaden, tror du, mellan de som sprider samhällsskadlig nazistpropaganda och de som sprider samhällsfarlig klimatförnekarpropaganda/högerextrem propaganda designat att skapa osämja och polarisering i samhället?
May 12, 2025 at 11:20 AM
Oh wow, almost as if you need some sort of REGULATION ON MEDIA in order to not spread untruths. Hmmm. @lasse2.bsky.social
May 12, 2025 at 10:51 AM
2) "Hur avgör man vem som talar sanning"? är också ett väldigt lösryckt "argument".

Det kommer gå utmärkt att med 99.9% säkerhet avgöra vilka som talar sanning om faktan om klimatet åtminstone, då det är ett väldigt faktaspäckat ämne.
May 12, 2025 at 10:48 AM
I så fall är det censur att lagföra de som sprider nazism/HMF.

Högern (världens höger) nu utnyttjar yttrandefriheten för att sprida enorma mängder desinformation som gynnar dem, eftersom de inte har skrupler.
May 12, 2025 at 10:47 AM
Reposted by Ree
Vill du ha förändring?

Förespråka den omedelbara inskränkningen av yttrandefriheten på internet för folk som sprider osanningar.

Vill du inte ha det så vill du inte förbättra världen på ett realistiskt sätt.
May 12, 2025 at 10:12 AM
Vill du ha förändring?

Förespråka den omedelbara inskränkningen av yttrandefriheten på internet för folk som sprider osanningar.

Vill du inte ha det så vill du inte förbättra världen på ett realistiskt sätt.
May 12, 2025 at 10:12 AM