I shouldn’t *know* the scores of certain games before reviews are even out, but there’s an enforced belief that some series/studios are so inherently good they deserve automatic praise.

Deviation isn’t tolerated, it’s violently mobbed. Going with such a strong flow is easy.

I don’t blame any critic who pulls a few punches to avoid the mob. I’d be shocked if it doesn’t happen - it’s a trivial thing to do compared to threats from unhinged people.

It’s what fans want. They literally attack critics for not pandering to them, not *anticipating* their uniform standards.

I think media made it weirdly taboo, or a sign of personal failure. Someone can be disinterested in you romantically and sexually, and not provide a good or logical reason. And it just means they weren't available, and you should move on to find someone, who is.

If someone wants to be friends, they find you emotionally and intellectually compatible. This is great. And saves you embarrassment and time seeking romantic and sexual response from someone who doesn't reciprocate it. Why is it treated as a failure.