youtu.be/ryheRQOZw0A?...

I would be super curious to have a sit down and discuss the need to anchor intelligence into the biological process.

I am working on a framework that mirrors what is being discussed:

Reaction to Reflection (R2R)

doi.org/10.1016/j.bi...

Value Saturation:
doi.org/10.1016/j.bi...

The gaps are closing...

doi.org/10.1016/j.bi...

Its a wonder they still float.

This may be the single most impressive collection of words I have ever read.

Yes this is true as both are inextricably linked and up until now science could not be expressed outside of the limitations of scientists.

Isn't this how science works? More of a popularity contest? You could have an answer to problem but unless you are scientifically popular no one hears you and then suddenly a popular scientist discovers the same idea and just rewords it.

#SciComm

doi.org/10.1016/j.bi...

Reaction vs. Reflection

There is a reason for this.

There is so much more that distinguishes humanity. I am beginning to question this magazine...more click than substance.

Separating consciousness from the self....like separating wetness from water.

I go into detail on this in my upcoming paper out of BioSystems:

www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

Once and for all?

As if we will not learn anything new in the future that would suggest anything different from what we know today?

100%

Internalizing external models is the process by which an organism’s representational constructs (about environment, others, and self) become embedded in the same recursive evaluative architecture that regulates internal states.

I agree. The whole battle between classical, operant, learning theory etc. (and others I am sure) is that they are all talking about different scales of the same process. So instead of realizing the recursive layers of intelligence (depth), they often try to apply it wholesale.

@textsavvy.org

Call me out on my B.S.

Is this making anything more clear?

Articulation is my Achilles heal.

More on Perspectival entrapment:

A consequence of being that process—not a separate condition—is that the observer cannot be separated from what is observed. This creates an inescapable first-person perspective: subjectivity itself. This is why consciousness feels like something.

We are the kind of system that processes mattering recursively. When the recursive process itself becomes a manipulable cognitive construct, the process is consciousness. Perspectival entrapment is a consequence of being that process, not a separate condition.

I hope that helps?