And this is how you justify only headlining the boosterism parts of the AI paper, and not the bits you don't want to talk about

(I use AI a lot, but I'm not a blatant shill for the companies)

Sigh, more trite rubbish from Jon Haidt, who clearly hasn't the first clue about how LLMs work...

Where the @nytimes.com demonstrates that it thinks its readers are as stupid as your average Trumpanzee