Harris campaigned hard in the battlegrounds, spent millions in outreach and advertising, had a massive ground and GOTV operation… and, well, here we are FIN/

“Terrible candidate” = Hillary-like, personal unpopularity among independents and even within the base, and front-runner hubris who took entire, critical constituencies (PA, MI, WI) for granted, with an incompetent campaign apparatus 3/

What I mean is, Harris certainly had flaws, but she was by no means a terrible candidate, and she was running against, let’s face it, an unpopular, openly horrible Republican candidate. How does a future, better Dem candidate beat a better, “normal” Republican given this reality