I am not quite sure that I can follow your question. We are indeed surprised that partitioning to DDX4N1 condensates appear to generalise to the behaviour of unrelated IDRs, so it most be sufficiently "promiscuous". Here, interactions seem to be better explained by partitioning rather than binding.

We also had the discussion a while back, and also ended up with the "signal above baseline" from laser scattering. Something like signal beyond 10 standard deviations of noise. But it does not help that you get "nano-cluster", or what else you call it, before full phase separation.