Profane tmesis
@ptmesis.writing.exchange.ap.brid.gy
Troutian idea pulp. All stories my own or found in the back of a cave. Free if you can get them home.
[bridged from https://writing.exchange/@ptmesis on the fediverse by https://fed.brid.gy/ ]
[bridged from https://writing.exchange/@ptmesis on the fediverse by https://fed.brid.gy/ ]
Reposted by Profane tmesis
@futurebird @ptmesis seems you can kind of load up your mind with a sort of question or curiosity and then go get coffee or walk around or whatever and then come back with the question more of a friend.
December 30, 2025 at 6:40 PM
@futurebird @ptmesis seems you can kind of load up your mind with a sort of question or curiosity and then go get coffee or walk around or whatever and then come back with the question more of a friend.
@futurebird
I often discuss this with students who struggle with procrastination. The pomodoro system shows you it's often as difficult to start working as it is to stop.
This was a crucial insight for me. It shows that procrastination isn't about being lazy, as much as it is about being […]
I often discuss this with students who struggle with procrastination. The pomodoro system shows you it's often as difficult to start working as it is to stop.
This was a crucial insight for me. It shows that procrastination isn't about being lazy, as much as it is about being […]
Original post on writing.exchange
writing.exchange
December 30, 2025 at 2:09 PM
@futurebird
I often discuss this with students who struggle with procrastination. The pomodoro system shows you it's often as difficult to start working as it is to stop.
This was a crucial insight for me. It shows that procrastination isn't about being lazy, as much as it is about being […]
I often discuss this with students who struggle with procrastination. The pomodoro system shows you it's often as difficult to start working as it is to stop.
This was a crucial insight for me. It shows that procrastination isn't about being lazy, as much as it is about being […]
@futurebird
(2) if I'm being strict with myself.
Much of my daily work requires this kind of concentration, so (1) or (3) might feel nicer, but it's not sustainable in the long term. If I want to keep being productive day after day, I need to stick with (2).
(2) if I'm being strict with myself.
Much of my daily work requires this kind of concentration, so (1) or (3) might feel nicer, but it's not sustainable in the long term. If I want to keep being productive day after day, I need to stick with (2).
December 30, 2025 at 1:55 PM
@futurebird
(2) if I'm being strict with myself.
Much of my daily work requires this kind of concentration, so (1) or (3) might feel nicer, but it's not sustainable in the long term. If I want to keep being productive day after day, I need to stick with (2).
(2) if I'm being strict with myself.
Much of my daily work requires this kind of concentration, so (1) or (3) might feel nicer, but it's not sustainable in the long term. If I want to keep being productive day after day, I need to stick with (2).
And even Eilish I probably learned about from the Guardian.
December 20, 2025 at 9:06 AM
And even Eilish I probably learned about from the Guardian.
Reposted by Profane tmesis
We set up a CRASH Clock website here: https://outerspaceinstitute.ca/crashclock/
Note that this is a probabilistic calculation. A catastrophic collision could happen sooner than 2.8 days of no maneuvers. In our (extremely computationally expensive) collision […]
[Original post on mastodon.social]
Note that this is a probabilistic calculation. A catastrophic collision could happen sooner than 2.8 days of no maneuvers. In our (extremely computationally expensive) collision […]
[Original post on mastodon.social]
December 11, 2025 at 2:32 PM
We set up a CRASH Clock website here: https://outerspaceinstitute.ca/crashclock/
Note that this is a probabilistic calculation. A catastrophic collision could happen sooner than 2.8 days of no maneuvers. In our (extremely computationally expensive) collision […]
[Original post on mastodon.social]
Note that this is a probabilistic calculation. A catastrophic collision could happen sooner than 2.8 days of no maneuvers. In our (extremely computationally expensive) collision […]
[Original post on mastodon.social]
Always the Steve Jobs, never the Steve Wozniak.
December 7, 2025 at 9:38 PM
Always the Steve Jobs, never the Steve Wozniak.