PsTeq1993
banner
psteq1993.bsky.social
PsTeq1993
@psteq1993.bsky.social
Bottom rail on top, this time.
Reposted by PsTeq1993
I always come back to this, as someone raised in the Catholic Church.
November 22, 2025 at 9:33 PM
You are out of your mind. Jesus christ himself could not win that district if not GOP
November 22, 2025 at 2:55 PM
Small
States are no where near as powerful as large ones. They just aren’t as powerless as they could be without the EC.
November 22, 2025 at 2:52 PM
Larger states that have more votes get more attention, funding, and deference bc political survival has always and will always be a major factor in politics. The founders knew this and rather than ignore it they took measures to check it.
November 22, 2025 at 2:52 PM
The reason for giving empowering smaller state is at least as true today. A check on the national govt to ignore 49% of the population. Power increases exponentially with population. Integration is irrelevant. They remain sovereign entities, also a check on the feds.
November 22, 2025 at 2:49 PM
Lol. Having a larger population is a better reason to have more protection for the minority voice, not less
November 22, 2025 at 1:58 PM
“Entrenches power in minority” is an incredibly good thing. This is like saying the sun heats our planet like it is bad
November 22, 2025 at 1:02 AM
To take that further newspapers were mostly opinion until the 20th century.
November 13, 2025 at 1:16 PM
Cannot be denied
a group of women standing next to each other with their hands on their hips .
Alt: SNL skit of four women flaunting their mom jeans
media.tenor.com
November 13, 2025 at 1:14 PM
Seems like that would’ve been low hanging fruit for the psychic to tell her too
November 11, 2025 at 4:41 PM
Just think of all the work you could get done if every day was a holiday!
November 11, 2025 at 4:14 PM
OK, yes, the the Davis case was not really about this in the first place. However, since when has that stopped the conservative members from going hog wild.
November 10, 2025 at 2:59 PM
Of course, if they meant that, they would apply it in other areas, including the Kim Davis appeal. They are both arbitrary and partisan.
November 10, 2025 at 2:58 PM
The point is, the supposed conservative members will arbitrarily overturn any ruling decades later that they don’t care for using the faux holier than thou of “righting something that was wrong at the time.“2/
November 10, 2025 at 2:58 PM