Given how I've seen people, especially those over 50, engage with AI online, I'm sure judges will engage with this in a responsible and nuanced way. Nothing to worry about here at all.

Alternative Title: Actually, The New York Times Has A Plan (to survive simply by becoming rage bait)

The undergraduate open ended question coding lobby endorses this message.

Concern about the influence, or concern about the optics? They've been cozy with Fuentes and his ilk for years, their views aren't "new" or "recently revealed." Seems to me more like they are only bothered now that people are paying attention to the anti-Semites that they are friendly with.

"America's most dangerous waterpark"

Action Park/Mountain Creek might just start a(nother) fight over that.

It's also leaking out of the "fringeier" parts of the far right eco-system (Alex Jones, segments of Q, and their ilk). They've been talking about fighting literal demons for years now, especially Jones.

In a few weeks: "...and for tonight's main story, polling, the thing people who failed basic stats pretend to be an expert in every 4 years."

I forgot if they had covered Thursday too on that episode!