Poli Sci Chick
@poliscichick.bsky.social
Political Scientist & Sociologist who likes to break things down & figure out what makes them tick. (she/her)
Follows & reposts ≠ endorsements.
Follows & reposts ≠ endorsements.
December 18, 2024 at 6:41 AM
December 17, 2024 at 6:23 AM
December 15, 2024 at 6:58 AM
December 13, 2024 at 10:49 PM
December 12, 2024 at 6:49 PM
December 12, 2024 at 8:28 AM
December 11, 2024 at 8:12 PM
Choose 20 books that have stayed with you or influenced you.
One book per day for 20 days, in no particular order.
No explanations, no reviews, just covers.
Day 1/20
📖💙📚
#books
#booksky
#bookchallenge
One book per day for 20 days, in no particular order.
No explanations, no reviews, just covers.
Day 1/20
📖💙📚
#books
#booksky
#bookchallenge
December 10, 2024 at 8:46 AM
Choose 20 books that have stayed with you or influenced you.
One book per day for 20 days, in no particular order.
No explanations, no reviews, just covers.
Day 1/20
📖💙📚
#books
#booksky
#bookchallenge
One book per day for 20 days, in no particular order.
No explanations, no reviews, just covers.
Day 1/20
📖💙📚
#books
#booksky
#bookchallenge
Please be mindful of the videos you watch, the accounts you follow and the blogs you read.
It’s very easy to fall into a political paranoia spiral in such a low-trust media environment.
It’s very easy to fall into a political paranoia spiral in such a low-trust media environment.
December 9, 2024 at 9:34 PM
Please be mindful of the videos you watch, the accounts you follow and the blogs you read.
It’s very easy to fall into a political paranoia spiral in such a low-trust media environment.
It’s very easy to fall into a political paranoia spiral in such a low-trust media environment.
after certified banger 🤯
December 9, 2024 at 9:02 PM
after certified banger 🤯
And then, it’s just banger…
December 9, 2024 at 8:53 PM
And then, it’s just banger…
The preamble goes so hard 😩
December 9, 2024 at 8:42 PM
The preamble goes so hard 😩
Do you remember this 2016 @forbes.com cover?
It’s actually a very interesting read. It provides wonderful insight on how narratives are constructed.
It does this before the article even starts. The cover itself is a great lesson.
Jared Kushner did not get Trump elected in 2016–
Steve Bannon did.
It’s actually a very interesting read. It provides wonderful insight on how narratives are constructed.
It does this before the article even starts. The cover itself is a great lesson.
Jared Kushner did not get Trump elected in 2016–
Steve Bannon did.
December 9, 2024 at 8:33 PM
Do you remember this 2016 @forbes.com cover?
It’s actually a very interesting read. It provides wonderful insight on how narratives are constructed.
It does this before the article even starts. The cover itself is a great lesson.
Jared Kushner did not get Trump elected in 2016–
Steve Bannon did.
It’s actually a very interesting read. It provides wonderful insight on how narratives are constructed.
It does this before the article even starts. The cover itself is a great lesson.
Jared Kushner did not get Trump elected in 2016–
Steve Bannon did.
There, Elon. I fixed it for you. You’re welcome 😘
“Defund the ACLU”’s implicit argument is to kneecap an organization that’s dedicated to preserving individual liberty and upholding the Constitution.
I’m fairly certain that Musk is not referring to his desire to give up his own.
“Defund the ACLU”’s implicit argument is to kneecap an organization that’s dedicated to preserving individual liberty and upholding the Constitution.
I’m fairly certain that Musk is not referring to his desire to give up his own.
December 9, 2024 at 5:32 AM
There, Elon. I fixed it for you. You’re welcome 😘
“Defund the ACLU”’s implicit argument is to kneecap an organization that’s dedicated to preserving individual liberty and upholding the Constitution.
I’m fairly certain that Musk is not referring to his desire to give up his own.
“Defund the ACLU”’s implicit argument is to kneecap an organization that’s dedicated to preserving individual liberty and upholding the Constitution.
I’m fairly certain that Musk is not referring to his desire to give up his own.
This is the same concept that plaintiffs had to push back against with the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in Jewel v. NSA.
It’s an argument that stands in direct opposition to civil rights.
I don’t know how this is considered an acceptable position that isn’t in conflict with Constitutionality.
It’s an argument that stands in direct opposition to civil rights.
I don’t know how this is considered an acceptable position that isn’t in conflict with Constitutionality.
December 5, 2024 at 4:22 AM
This is the same concept that plaintiffs had to push back against with the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in Jewel v. NSA.
It’s an argument that stands in direct opposition to civil rights.
I don’t know how this is considered an acceptable position that isn’t in conflict with Constitutionality.
It’s an argument that stands in direct opposition to civil rights.
I don’t know how this is considered an acceptable position that isn’t in conflict with Constitutionality.
I still think about this Reddit post and so I had to share it here.
Here’s my response:
Discrimination is unjust treatment; it’s prejudicial behavior. Injustice is never necessary.
Here’s my response:
Discrimination is unjust treatment; it’s prejudicial behavior. Injustice is never necessary.
December 2, 2024 at 2:02 AM
I still think about this Reddit post and so I had to share it here.
Here’s my response:
Discrimination is unjust treatment; it’s prejudicial behavior. Injustice is never necessary.
Here’s my response:
Discrimination is unjust treatment; it’s prejudicial behavior. Injustice is never necessary.