I’m not suggesting it was a planned stunt, but there’s no way most people would even know this game exists otherwise. The only reason your (or any) outlet covered, let alone reviewed that game at all was the controversy.

I am saying they should’ve charged significantly more.

Maybe even the inverse. I don’t trust a game that costs less than a latte or a movie rental out of the gate.

Charging only $5 to sell their esoteric art game to a vanishingly small audience certainly was a choice.

Eh. I’m glad I played it but if I wanted to play again id go back to the snes version.

We need to bring back “philistine”as a slur.

I can hear this in his voice and cadence as clear as a bell.

What’s the score when corrected for the “Nintendo bump?”

@relentlesspicnic.com Urgent new analysis needed

Deep cut

And not just Pokémon, either. I would love to read a review of ANY Nintendo game that wasn’t written by an avowed superfan.

Didn’t know my Patreon money would be used to start up a Wizzard cover band.

The suggestion here that Nintendo has to buy positive coverage of their games is very, very funny.

Only 99,252,560 to go!