“…why we’re by far the better of your only two realistic options.” It’s the Dems’ strongest selling point and it’s STILL virtually untested.
July 7, 2025 at 2:33 AM
“…why we’re by far the better of your only two realistic options.” It’s the Dems’ strongest selling point and it’s STILL virtually untested.
Except nobody knocked on doors and said “Vote for us because we aren’t Trump.” It was always cloaked in some “competing positive message” bullshit. I never saw an ad that said “Fox News is chewing your ear off about how corrupt we are. I’ll now go point for point in order of importance…
July 7, 2025 at 2:31 AM
Except nobody knocked on doors and said “Vote for us because we aren’t Trump.” It was always cloaked in some “competing positive message” bullshit. I never saw an ad that said “Fox News is chewing your ear off about how corrupt we are. I’ll now go point for point in order of importance…
Rubbish. If there’s a dumpster fire that needs to be put out, you run on putting the fire out.
July 1, 2025 at 3:53 AM
Rubbish. If there’s a dumpster fire that needs to be put out, you run on putting the fire out.
Technically, she was convicted, but…
Yeah.
Maybe I was tilted because her fanbase made me kinda want her to get the chair.
Yeah.
Maybe I was tilted because her fanbase made me kinda want her to get the chair.
June 19, 2025 at 2:21 AM
Technically, she was convicted, but…
Yeah.
Maybe I was tilted because her fanbase made me kinda want her to get the chair.
Yeah.
Maybe I was tilted because her fanbase made me kinda want her to get the chair.
The prosecution, competently staffed, turned out to have way stronger forensic evidence than I’d thought in the first trial, and they’re tearing the defense to shreds on cross.
June 4, 2025 at 10:40 PM
The prosecution, competently staffed, turned out to have way stronger forensic evidence than I’d thought in the first trial, and they’re tearing the defense to shreds on cross.
The question is “would you please not smoke here?” More of a request than a question, but that’s what they call it. Instead of asking it, they presume your compliance and thank you for it.
June 4, 2025 at 12:08 AM
The question is “would you please not smoke here?” More of a request than a question, but that’s what they call it. Instead of asking it, they presume your compliance and thank you for it.
Nice work! Unfortunately, it takes years before you’re not thinking about it, but the grind is so worth it.
June 4, 2025 at 12:02 AM
Nice work! Unfortunately, it takes years before you’re not thinking about it, but the grind is so worth it.
“Thank you for not smoking”
June 3, 2025 at 6:20 PM
“Thank you for not smoking”
Technically that would be rhetorical questioning.
Begging implies the question in the form of a feeble “stern” thank you for your compliance.
“Thanks for understanding how much we value customer service, and thanks for your patience.”
Begging implies the question in the form of a feeble “stern” thank you for your compliance.
“Thanks for understanding how much we value customer service, and thanks for your patience.”
June 1, 2025 at 5:02 PM
Technically that would be rhetorical questioning.
Begging implies the question in the form of a feeble “stern” thank you for your compliance.
“Thanks for understanding how much we value customer service, and thanks for your patience.”
Begging implies the question in the form of a feeble “stern” thank you for your compliance.
“Thanks for understanding how much we value customer service, and thanks for your patience.”
Duchamp’s Fountain is a piece of art, and it’s an industrially manufactured toilet bowl, unaltered aside from context. Imo, a person who makes and sells pictures to hang on walls is a decorator, not an artist.
May 21, 2025 at 6:15 PM
Duchamp’s Fountain is a piece of art, and it’s an industrially manufactured toilet bowl, unaltered aside from context. Imo, a person who makes and sells pictures to hang on walls is a decorator, not an artist.