Pete Lewin
@petelewin.bsky.social
Video games lawyer & business advisor
Partner @ Wiggin
Partner @ Wiggin
Pleased to announce 'Wig-Indies' - a new initiative which continues our long-running commitment to supporting incredible new games businesses of tomorrow.
Free legal consultations, indie packages, flexible fee models and more – all offered by people that love and play games.
Free legal consultations, indie packages, flexible fee models and more – all offered by people that love and play games.
June 26, 2025 at 2:25 PM
Pleased to announce 'Wig-Indies' - a new initiative which continues our long-running commitment to supporting incredible new games businesses of tomorrow.
Free legal consultations, indie packages, flexible fee models and more – all offered by people that love and play games.
Free legal consultations, indie packages, flexible fee models and more – all offered by people that love and play games.
*Repost from Jan 2024*
I've been working with indie studios as a games lawyer for nearly a decade.
For anyone taking recent events as a chance to start up their own studio, I hope these legal tips help.
Good luck out there!
I've been working with indie studios as a games lawyer for nearly a decade.
For anyone taking recent events as a chance to start up their own studio, I hope these legal tips help.
Good luck out there!
January 27, 2025 at 4:01 PM
*Repost from Jan 2024*
I've been working with indie studios as a games lawyer for nearly a decade.
For anyone taking recent events as a chance to start up their own studio, I hope these legal tips help.
Good luck out there!
I've been working with indie studios as a games lawyer for nearly a decade.
For anyone taking recent events as a chance to start up their own studio, I hope these legal tips help.
Good luck out there!
Disputes regarding indie game IP ownership are unfortunately common.
Indie dev often starts between friends, where noone wants to talk business.
But it's not that complicated - set up a company, put the IP in that, and get agreements with contributors. It'll be worth it.
Indie dev often starts between friends, where noone wants to talk business.
But it's not that complicated - set up a company, put the IP in that, and get agreements with contributors. It'll be worth it.
Celeste Dev Makes "Difficult Decision" To Cancel New Game Earthblade.
Celeste Dev Makes "Difficult Decision" To Cancel New Game Earthblade
Following "a disagreement about the IP rights of Celeste"
www.nintendolife.com
January 24, 2025 at 11:51 AM
Disputes regarding indie game IP ownership are unfortunately common.
Indie dev often starts between friends, where noone wants to talk business.
But it's not that complicated - set up a company, put the IP in that, and get agreements with contributors. It'll be worth it.
Indie dev often starts between friends, where noone wants to talk business.
But it's not that complicated - set up a company, put the IP in that, and get agreements with contributors. It'll be worth it.
VIDEO GAMES DEALS - a 🧵
I spend 75% of my working life negotiating games deals. They’re complex, messy and completely non-standardised (i.e. great fun), which often results in an inconsistent use of deal terminology.
I spend 75% of my working life negotiating games deals. They’re complex, messy and completely non-standardised (i.e. great fun), which often results in an inconsistent use of deal terminology.
January 21, 2025 at 5:42 PM
VIDEO GAMES DEALS - a 🧵
I spend 75% of my working life negotiating games deals. They’re complex, messy and completely non-standardised (i.e. great fun), which often results in an inconsistent use of deal terminology.
I spend 75% of my working life negotiating games deals. They’re complex, messy and completely non-standardised (i.e. great fun), which often results in an inconsistent use of deal terminology.
I’m not across the details, but it sounds like what Google has done here is what it’s supposed to do under DMCA - i.e
Take down content on receipt of notice
If the other party contests, the content goes back up
UNLESS the party submitting the complaint litigates within 14 days
Take down content on receipt of notice
If the other party contests, the content goes back up
UNLESS the party submitting the complaint litigates within 14 days
The studio behind the popular Poppy Playtime series is suing Google for failing to take action to remove 'scam' imitation apps from the Google Play store.
www.videogameschronicle.com/news/poppy-p...
www.videogameschronicle.com/news/poppy-p...
Poppy Playtime studio sues Google for not pulling ‘scam’ imitator apps from its store | VGC
Mob Entertainment says fake Poppy Playtime games have been on Google Play for months…
www.videogameschronicle.com
January 17, 2025 at 12:42 PM
I’m not across the details, but it sounds like what Google has done here is what it’s supposed to do under DMCA - i.e
Take down content on receipt of notice
If the other party contests, the content goes back up
UNLESS the party submitting the complaint litigates within 14 days
Take down content on receipt of notice
If the other party contests, the content goes back up
UNLESS the party submitting the complaint litigates within 14 days
AAA game budgets...
New court filings indicate three Call of Duty games cost between $450m - $700m to develop *each*. That covers initial development costs and post-release content, but not marketing. Those were for games in 2015-2020, meaning latest entries are likely even higher.
New court filings indicate three Call of Duty games cost between $450m - $700m to develop *each*. That covers initial development costs and post-release content, but not marketing. Those were for games in 2015-2020, meaning latest entries are likely even higher.
January 13, 2025 at 2:52 PM
AAA game budgets...
New court filings indicate three Call of Duty games cost between $450m - $700m to develop *each*. That covers initial development costs and post-release content, but not marketing. Those were for games in 2015-2020, meaning latest entries are likely even higher.
New court filings indicate three Call of Duty games cost between $450m - $700m to develop *each*. That covers initial development costs and post-release content, but not marketing. Those were for games in 2015-2020, meaning latest entries are likely even higher.
Reposted by Pete Lewin
Ever heard of a "pay or play" clause? e.g.
"Composer shall receive, on a pay or play basis, the sum of [AMOUNT] as fee for all composing, producing, recording and performance of the Score."
It basically means that you have to pay the other party, even if they never actually provide the services!
"Composer shall receive, on a pay or play basis, the sum of [AMOUNT] as fee for all composing, producing, recording and performance of the Score."
It basically means that you have to pay the other party, even if they never actually provide the services!
December 4, 2024 at 5:30 PM
Ever heard of a "pay or play" clause? e.g.
"Composer shall receive, on a pay or play basis, the sum of [AMOUNT] as fee for all composing, producing, recording and performance of the Score."
It basically means that you have to pay the other party, even if they never actually provide the services!
"Composer shall receive, on a pay or play basis, the sum of [AMOUNT] as fee for all composing, producing, recording and performance of the Score."
It basically means that you have to pay the other party, even if they never actually provide the services!
Ever heard of a "pay or play" clause? e.g.
"Composer shall receive, on a pay or play basis, the sum of [AMOUNT] as fee for all composing, producing, recording and performance of the Score."
It basically means that you have to pay the other party, even if they never actually provide the services!
"Composer shall receive, on a pay or play basis, the sum of [AMOUNT] as fee for all composing, producing, recording and performance of the Score."
It basically means that you have to pay the other party, even if they never actually provide the services!
December 4, 2024 at 5:30 PM
Ever heard of a "pay or play" clause? e.g.
"Composer shall receive, on a pay or play basis, the sum of [AMOUNT] as fee for all composing, producing, recording and performance of the Score."
It basically means that you have to pay the other party, even if they never actually provide the services!
"Composer shall receive, on a pay or play basis, the sum of [AMOUNT] as fee for all composing, producing, recording and performance of the Score."
It basically means that you have to pay the other party, even if they never actually provide the services!
Reposted by Pete Lewin
Why having a lawyer review any agreement is necessary.
This stuff is real…
This stuff is real…
Dev funding is recouped from Net Revenue.
Dev funding is recouped from Dev’s share of Net Revenue.
Spot the difference?
Those two extra words can result in a dev potentially never seeing a single penny from their game, even if it’s a success.
Dev funding is recouped from Dev’s share of Net Revenue.
Spot the difference?
Those two extra words can result in a dev potentially never seeing a single penny from their game, even if it’s a success.
November 28, 2024 at 8:30 AM
Why having a lawyer review any agreement is necessary.
This stuff is real…
This stuff is real…
Dev funding is recouped from Net Revenue.
Dev funding is recouped from Dev’s share of Net Revenue.
Spot the difference?
Those two extra words can result in a dev potentially never seeing a single penny from their game, even if it’s a success.
Dev funding is recouped from Dev’s share of Net Revenue.
Spot the difference?
Those two extra words can result in a dev potentially never seeing a single penny from their game, even if it’s a success.
November 28, 2024 at 7:34 AM
Dev funding is recouped from Net Revenue.
Dev funding is recouped from Dev’s share of Net Revenue.
Spot the difference?
Those two extra words can result in a dev potentially never seeing a single penny from their game, even if it’s a success.
Dev funding is recouped from Dev’s share of Net Revenue.
Spot the difference?
Those two extra words can result in a dev potentially never seeing a single penny from their game, even if it’s a success.
75% of my professional life is advising on commercial deals like these.
Publishing deals are notoriously complex, inconsistent and (on the whole) poorly written.
I have NEVER seen a publishing where I’d recommend a dev signs the first draft.
Publishing deals are notoriously complex, inconsistent and (on the whole) poorly written.
I have NEVER seen a publishing where I’d recommend a dev signs the first draft.
Game publishers shouldn’t be encouraging devs not to get a lawyer to review their contract :)
November 25, 2024 at 9:17 AM
75% of my professional life is advising on commercial deals like these.
Publishing deals are notoriously complex, inconsistent and (on the whole) poorly written.
I have NEVER seen a publishing where I’d recommend a dev signs the first draft.
Publishing deals are notoriously complex, inconsistent and (on the whole) poorly written.
I have NEVER seen a publishing where I’d recommend a dev signs the first draft.
Hello!
I’m a video games lawyer / business advisor in London.
I want to help good people make awesome games.
Let’s connect!
👋👋
I’m a video games lawyer / business advisor in London.
I want to help good people make awesome games.
Let’s connect!
👋👋
November 25, 2024 at 8:26 AM
Hello!
I’m a video games lawyer / business advisor in London.
I want to help good people make awesome games.
Let’s connect!
👋👋
I’m a video games lawyer / business advisor in London.
I want to help good people make awesome games.
Let’s connect!
👋👋