Peter Ehrlich
pehrlich.bsky.social
Peter Ehrlich
@pehrlich.bsky.social
Ex-Stripe Software Engineer, now at Joinarbor.com. I am a climate advocate, and generally thorough person.

I write on https://pehrlich.substack.com/
Reposted by Peter Ehrlich
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills: the emails from Landon Thomas has his New York Times signature block...he was employed by NY Times at the time. He was communicating directly with Epstein about Trump, and was given incriminating information about Trump. It's been in NYT's possession since 2015
November 12, 2025 at 7:23 PM
Hm I gave that a read and am uncertain - some good points I missed, but maybe also some he missed. Will look a little more closely when have some focus time
November 8, 2025 at 8:09 PM
How do you know? I spent a lot of my own time studying their work, and could not come to any conclusion other than there's something wrong here pehrlich.substack.com/p/making-sen...
Making Sense of Election Fraud Claims
Election Security is not a "tinfoil hat" concern. Maybe we've been gas-lit into thinking so?
pehrlich.substack.com
November 8, 2025 at 3:31 PM
Who gives a hoot about the white house. How about them Epstein Files? Or free and fair elections?
October 24, 2025 at 7:21 PM
I mean that's a bit of a predicament, eh? In order to get anything like evidence, you need enough "weird stuff" in the data patterns to get states to actually look at their stockpiles of potential evidence held under lock and key.
June 22, 2025 at 12:20 PM
I agree with her - Bullet Ballots / Dropoff analysis is not the most compelling. What Election Truth Alliance has put out since that video is a very different ball-o-wax. Why should Trump:Kamala ratio depend on how many votes a machine got (controlling for location)? www.youtube.com/@ElectionTru...
Election Truth Alliance
The Election Truth Alliance is a grassroots organization formed to support and facilitate improved information-sharing of analysis, discussion, and peaceful actions that can be taken regarding irregul...
www.youtube.com
June 22, 2025 at 1:31 AM
True! And they make no pretense of being more than a theory. A theory which can be validated or invalidated with paper ballots
June 21, 2025 at 1:38 AM
You can say that, but I have yet to see an actual evidence backed rebuttal of their data. Their sources and methodologies are public for the world to see. They are nothing if not evidence based and factual.
June 20, 2025 at 11:07 PM
Everywhere? Powering palintir. And the theory is that AI was used to replace in-memory ballot images inside tabulator machines
June 20, 2025 at 1:28 AM
I did my own. Most interesting part was simulating the what we theorize the fraudulent patterns to be, and finding the same asymptotic curve: pehrlich.substack.com/p/making-sen...
Making Sense of Election Fraud Claims
Election Security is not a "tinfoil hat" concern. Maybe we've been gas-lit into thinking so?
pehrlich.substack.com
June 20, 2025 at 1:26 AM
Yeah you can go read the scientific work and reproduce what they've done yourself. They're nothing if not data-backed and rational. electiontruthalliance.org/pennsylvania
Election Truth Alliance
Election Analysis: Ensuring Fair and Transparent Results
electiontruthalliance.org
June 20, 2025 at 1:21 AM
I was just listening to your podcast w/ Heinrich, love it! But to your question about political physics... I think you have to take and hour and read to understand electiontruthalliance.org/pennsylvania -- the idea
Of waiting for midterms could be counterproductive
Election Truth Alliance
Election Analysis: Ensuring Fair and Transparent Results
electiontruthalliance.org
June 15, 2025 at 7:02 PM