peglind.bsky.social
peglind.bsky.social
@peglind.bsky.social
Self reported use of a new toy therefore of dubious reliability. Any benefit probably one off. And I wonder how any time saved will be used for tangible social benefits v negative impact of increased data processing.
October 30, 2025 at 2:08 AM
The accumulated GHG levels & albedo loss mean that even if we do get rid of FF soon global heating will continue for decades. So planetary cooling needed IN ADDITION to emission reduction and carbon sequestration. Unfortunate but true. So let’s research geoengineering options now.
September 10, 2025 at 4:47 AM
I find it extraordinary how Jews from the diaspora can move to Israel and suddenly believe that they have the right to kill and expel Palestinians whose families have been living in that land for very many generations. What extraordinarily heartless arrogance.
September 10, 2025 at 4:38 AM
Ok, slightly better than the usual guff, but still doesn’t really do just to the positive side of a gradual reduction in population.
September 3, 2025 at 4:55 AM
Keep trying. You never know who may be listening!
August 25, 2025 at 5:28 AM
The fundamental difference is that agriculture recycles carbon already in the biosphere, where’s fossil fuels add to the atmosphere C that has been locked out of the biosphere for millennia.
July 30, 2025 at 12:44 AM
Yet another indication that great artists are not necessarily deep political analysts, and are often given platforms on topics beyond their expertise
July 28, 2025 at 12:05 AM
You’re clearly getting the wrong feeds here Genevieve.But why are you propping up X?
July 27, 2025 at 1:07 AM
Thanks, very interesting
July 16, 2025 at 12:52 AM
It’s an even sillier idea from an environmental perspective. I’m firmly in the anti pronatalist camp, But isn’t the main reason for expansion to catch up with demand?
July 13, 2025 at 11:52 AM
Ok, so there are a number of possible shipping routes, but all are vulnerable to disruption or blockage. Might there be benefits in deterring or at least increasing to costs to those bent on disruption? If so, are subs or undersea drones useful to do this?
June 11, 2025 at 12:29 PM
I agree that a Chinese invasion is not plausible- they have many other better ways of dominating us if they wish to.But I don’t think you can discount blocking shipping lanes as easily as you do.
June 11, 2025 at 4:15 AM
What's your point John? Are you suggesting that the PRC isn't cutting cables or harassing fishing boats? Or that they're doing it but the tactics are unlikely to be effective? If it is occurring, it's presumably just part of a suite of actions to ramp up pressure on Taiwan.
May 17, 2025 at 11:26 AM