yea that must be right. although is

i’m done talking to anyone

ok? seems less than perfect to me for some reason

or maybe he understands “i’m done” as downward entailing? which, wait a minute, isn’t it?

i’m done petting dogs -> i’m done petting fuzzy dogs

so the real question is why anymore sounds # to us adults!

yea i saw there’s some other services up now. you’ve done good work here 🫡

lol how much is that running you

web services that let you quickly throw together a website and publish it always have goofy URLs like that

but don’t you think there’s some amount of wealth W s.t. if the poorest person has W, no one’s poor, even if some other people also have 10W or 100W or 1000W?

you can own a fridge and still be at risk of homelessness or not have money to get adequate medical treatment, or need to work >40 hrs/week which feel like objective measures of poverty independent of technology or relative wealth

if johnson gavels the house into session to vote on the senate deal then he’ll have to seat grijalva. if he somehow doesn’t that’s riot-on-the-house-floor type stuff

forcing trump to veto releasing the files would be pretty bad for him i think

how did they know postava was gonna get hurt??

i feel like you are personally responsible for the detroit outcome

ok but how much of this is that one tampa bay game.

also i see a lot of QTs saying “this better not take ppls jobs”. i hope it does? these are the tedious jobs AI/robotics *should* be taking instead of “artist” and “actor” and whatnot? ideally combined with a 2023-era joe biden economy?

like shouldn’t we want a world where everyone’s rich enough to afford the robot servants and no one’s so broke they have to work as a human servant?

like the lesson of biden’s economy was it was so good for working class ppl that things like house cleaners and delivery drivers became expensive! by contrast in really poor countries even middle-class ppl can afford servants bc you can pay them peanuts.

also i see a lot of QTs saying “this better not take ppls jobs”. i hope it does? these are the tedious jobs AI/robotics *should* be taking instead of “artist” and “actor” and whatnot? ideally combined with a 2023-era joe biden economy?

right which is probably why they’re not in the nhl data in the first place

i guess ideally you’d count that kind of thing (e.g. whiffs on a one-timer) since those are chances even if not shots? like they are clearly they are shot attempts by the plain meaning of that term. but i’m guessing it would be ~impossible to infer those kinds of events from the data