- END 🧵-
- END 🧵-
Republicans who voted to "repeal and replace" the Affordable Care Act in 2017 were more likely to lose reelection than their co-partisans who voted "No"
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Republicans who voted to "repeal and replace" the Affordable Care Act in 2017 were more likely to lose reelection than their co-partisans who voted "No"
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
equitablegrowth.org/working-pape...
equitablegrowth.org/working-pape...
61 percent of Republicans in this group opposed the bill, with less than one-quarter supporting
61 percent of Republicans in this group opposed the bill, with less than one-quarter supporting
In fact, opposition outnumbered support by a ratio of 7 to 1!
In fact, opposition outnumbered support by a ratio of 7 to 1!
Among those who were asked directly for their opinions, opposition already outpaced support by nearly 20 percentage points
Among those who were asked directly for their opinions, opposition already outpaced support by nearly 20 percentage points
That is profoundly unfair.
That is profoundly unfair.
equitablegrowth.org/congressiona...
equitablegrowth.org/congressiona...
equitablegrowth.org/working-pape...
equitablegrowth.org/working-pape...
Opposition increased for all groups (Dems, Independents, Reps) who received information on the bill's regressivity.
However, the effects of this information were largest among Republicans
Opposition increased for all groups (Dems, Independents, Reps) who received information on the bill's regressivity.
However, the effects of this information were largest among Republicans