Partaker in Discourse
partaker.bsky.social
Partaker in Discourse
@partaker.bsky.social
Could you be more specific
- you don't need to wait for an aesthetic famine to break out and fascists to arrive promising, like communists, to bring the people bread at any price- and the heads of those who had "stolen" it before.

Ultimately the people are owed a sense of meaning. Identity, too, is a public service. 6/6
October 18, 2025 at 2:23 PM
The thing is, there are forces that control the present state of the diorama, and a sane political and cultural elite would engage with them directly. Confucius writes about the importance of "not neglecting the ceremonies". If aesthetics are in demand, they can be manufactured- 5/6
October 18, 2025 at 2:23 PM
They refer all judgements to the diorama as presently constituted; the entire narrative of history is only meaningful in how it finds expression in this final product, to them. The british wear tweed and eat fish-n-chips; they do not wear hoodies and eat curry. It is written. 4/6
October 18, 2025 at 2:23 PM
The aesthetic of britishness, as they understand it, has fish'n'chips, and somehow not curry. One is present in the diorama, and one is not. The historicity of either of these choices is utterly meaningless to them - not even disputed, but meaningless. They have their preferred diorama. 3/6
October 18, 2025 at 2:23 PM
It's important to understand that what the right wants is not food or material goods, which are available in abundance, but a bath of aesthetics; the one good that is currently in shortage. 2/6
October 18, 2025 at 2:23 PM
Reposted by Partaker in Discourse
I do wonder when media outlets will get interested in ballooning everyday costs. My family's grocery bill has exploded over the past six months and - unlike when a Democrat is president - this is a non-story.
October 1, 2025 at 11:54 AM
September 7, 2025 at 2:13 PM