Robert Parker
@parkernfc.bsky.social
Passionate about stopping global warming & putting a spine back into Australian manufacturing. Ex President Aust. Nuclear Association & ANU Nuclear Masters Grad
The utter hypocrisy of the Australian Government pushing to host COP31.
Our government campaigns against our lowest emitting form of energy while Turkey is building a fleet of new nuclear power plants.
We have the same anti-nuke policy as the German Climate Criminals
www.abc.net.au/news/2025-11...
Our government campaigns against our lowest emitting form of energy while Turkey is building a fleet of new nuclear power plants.
We have the same anti-nuke policy as the German Climate Criminals
www.abc.net.au/news/2025-11...
Sharing COP presidency with Türkiye 'not an option', says Albanese
As Chris Bowen lands in Belém with the clock ticking on a resolution, Anthony Albanese says the rules against co-presidency for the COP are clear.
www.abc.net.au
November 17, 2025 at 6:49 AM
The utter hypocrisy of the Australian Government pushing to host COP31.
Our government campaigns against our lowest emitting form of energy while Turkey is building a fleet of new nuclear power plants.
We have the same anti-nuke policy as the German Climate Criminals
www.abc.net.au/news/2025-11...
Our government campaigns against our lowest emitting form of energy while Turkey is building a fleet of new nuclear power plants.
We have the same anti-nuke policy as the German Climate Criminals
www.abc.net.au/news/2025-11...
The total cost including the main project and all transmission could blow out to $25billion.
That's 13 times Malcolm Turnbull's announced cost of $2billion. The same guy who claimed there was no business case for nuclear energy.
youtu.be/gHl2vkwihvA
That's 13 times Malcolm Turnbull's announced cost of $2billion. The same guy who claimed there was no business case for nuclear energy.
youtu.be/gHl2vkwihvA
youtu.be
October 14, 2025 at 5:30 PM
The total cost including the main project and all transmission could blow out to $25billion.
That's 13 times Malcolm Turnbull's announced cost of $2billion. The same guy who claimed there was no business case for nuclear energy.
youtu.be/gHl2vkwihvA
That's 13 times Malcolm Turnbull's announced cost of $2billion. The same guy who claimed there was no business case for nuclear energy.
youtu.be/gHl2vkwihvA
I cover:
-New nuclear plants in China
-Debacle on the Iberian Peninsular
-Costs of nuclear plants for Australia
-Nuke plants suited to Coalition Policy
-Costs & emissions of nuclear
-Stopping a Spanish style blackout
-Callous indifference of the ALP to low cost + low emissions
youtu.be/j94YjCEsnZk
-New nuclear plants in China
-Debacle on the Iberian Peninsular
-Costs of nuclear plants for Australia
-Nuke plants suited to Coalition Policy
-Costs & emissions of nuclear
-Stopping a Spanish style blackout
-Callous indifference of the ALP to low cost + low emissions
youtu.be/j94YjCEsnZk
video1643084983
YouTube video by Robert Parker
youtu.be
April 30, 2025 at 6:47 AM
I cover:
-New nuclear plants in China
-Debacle on the Iberian Peninsular
-Costs of nuclear plants for Australia
-Nuke plants suited to Coalition Policy
-Costs & emissions of nuclear
-Stopping a Spanish style blackout
-Callous indifference of the ALP to low cost + low emissions
youtu.be/j94YjCEsnZk
-New nuclear plants in China
-Debacle on the Iberian Peninsular
-Costs of nuclear plants for Australia
-Nuke plants suited to Coalition Policy
-Costs & emissions of nuclear
-Stopping a Spanish style blackout
-Callous indifference of the ALP to low cost + low emissions
youtu.be/j94YjCEsnZk
Reposted by Robert Parker
In this video we outline the impossibility of achieving deep decarbonisation without nuclear energy.
It will be a vital part of our energy transition for both an emissions and economic perspective
youtu.be/jWhhR_u8vhI
#auspol #ClimateRisk #Energy #Climate #Nuclear
It will be a vital part of our energy transition for both an emissions and economic perspective
youtu.be/jWhhR_u8vhI
#auspol #ClimateRisk #Energy #Climate #Nuclear
Carbon Emissions
YouTube video by Robert Parker
youtu.be
April 13, 2025 at 11:26 AM
In this video we outline the impossibility of achieving deep decarbonisation without nuclear energy.
It will be a vital part of our energy transition for both an emissions and economic perspective
youtu.be/jWhhR_u8vhI
#auspol #ClimateRisk #Energy #Climate #Nuclear
It will be a vital part of our energy transition for both an emissions and economic perspective
youtu.be/jWhhR_u8vhI
#auspol #ClimateRisk #Energy #Climate #Nuclear
In this video we outline the impossibility of achieving deep decarbonisation without nuclear energy.
It will be a vital part of our energy transition for both an emissions and economic perspective
youtu.be/jWhhR_u8vhI
#auspol #ClimateRisk #Energy #Climate #Nuclear
It will be a vital part of our energy transition for both an emissions and economic perspective
youtu.be/jWhhR_u8vhI
#auspol #ClimateRisk #Energy #Climate #Nuclear
Carbon Emissions
YouTube video by Robert Parker
youtu.be
April 13, 2025 at 11:26 AM
In this video we outline the impossibility of achieving deep decarbonisation without nuclear energy.
It will be a vital part of our energy transition for both an emissions and economic perspective
youtu.be/jWhhR_u8vhI
#auspol #ClimateRisk #Energy #Climate #Nuclear
It will be a vital part of our energy transition for both an emissions and economic perspective
youtu.be/jWhhR_u8vhI
#auspol #ClimateRisk #Energy #Climate #Nuclear
Australia goes to the polls in a few weeks
We need to ensure we don't fall into an Energy Blunder
Nuclear is vital for a low cost ultra low carbon energy future Down under
youtu.be/roXLKlelJFA
#auspol #ClimateRisk
We need to ensure we don't fall into an Energy Blunder
Nuclear is vital for a low cost ultra low carbon energy future Down under
youtu.be/roXLKlelJFA
#auspol #ClimateRisk
Voting to Avoid an Energy Blunder
YouTube video by Robert Parker
youtu.be
April 8, 2025 at 6:37 AM
Australia goes to the polls in a few weeks
We need to ensure we don't fall into an Energy Blunder
Nuclear is vital for a low cost ultra low carbon energy future Down under
youtu.be/roXLKlelJFA
#auspol #ClimateRisk
We need to ensure we don't fall into an Energy Blunder
Nuclear is vital for a low cost ultra low carbon energy future Down under
youtu.be/roXLKlelJFA
#auspol #ClimateRisk
Australia goes to the polls in a few weeks
We need to ensure we don't fall into an Energy Blunder
Nuclear is vital for a low cost ultra low carbon energy future Down under
youtu.be/roXLKlelJFA
We need to ensure we don't fall into an Energy Blunder
Nuclear is vital for a low cost ultra low carbon energy future Down under
youtu.be/roXLKlelJFA
Voting to Avoid an Energy Blunder
YouTube video by Robert Parker
youtu.be
April 8, 2025 at 6:33 AM
Australia goes to the polls in a few weeks
We need to ensure we don't fall into an Energy Blunder
Nuclear is vital for a low cost ultra low carbon energy future Down under
youtu.be/roXLKlelJFA
We need to ensure we don't fall into an Energy Blunder
Nuclear is vital for a low cost ultra low carbon energy future Down under
youtu.be/roXLKlelJFA
@sophiescamps.bsky.social
Sophie Scamps please support nuclear energy
Bowen is wrong about the costs in our system
Its not $600B -its only $198B by 2050
Total Nuclear+RE cost is half Step Change at $384B vs $846B
Nuclear stops fossil fuels & has 1/4 the emissions & France proves it works every day
Sophie Scamps please support nuclear energy
Bowen is wrong about the costs in our system
Its not $600B -its only $198B by 2050
Total Nuclear+RE cost is half Step Change at $384B vs $846B
Nuclear stops fossil fuels & has 1/4 the emissions & France proves it works every day
March 30, 2025 at 10:17 PM
@sophiescamps.bsky.social
Sophie Scamps please support nuclear energy
Bowen is wrong about the costs in our system
Its not $600B -its only $198B by 2050
Total Nuclear+RE cost is half Step Change at $384B vs $846B
Nuclear stops fossil fuels & has 1/4 the emissions & France proves it works every day
Sophie Scamps please support nuclear energy
Bowen is wrong about the costs in our system
Its not $600B -its only $198B by 2050
Total Nuclear+RE cost is half Step Change at $384B vs $846B
Nuclear stops fossil fuels & has 1/4 the emissions & France proves it works every day
@katechaneymp.bsky.social
Kate Chaney please support nuclear energy
Bowen is wrong about the costs in our system
Its not $600B -its only $198B by 2050
Total Nuclear+RE cost is half Step Change at $384B vs $846B
Nuclear stops fossil fuels & has 1/4 the emissions & France proves it works every day
Kate Chaney please support nuclear energy
Bowen is wrong about the costs in our system
Its not $600B -its only $198B by 2050
Total Nuclear+RE cost is half Step Change at $384B vs $846B
Nuclear stops fossil fuels & has 1/4 the emissions & France proves it works every day
March 30, 2025 at 10:15 PM
@katechaneymp.bsky.social
Kate Chaney please support nuclear energy
Bowen is wrong about the costs in our system
Its not $600B -its only $198B by 2050
Total Nuclear+RE cost is half Step Change at $384B vs $846B
Nuclear stops fossil fuels & has 1/4 the emissions & France proves it works every day
Kate Chaney please support nuclear energy
Bowen is wrong about the costs in our system
Its not $600B -its only $198B by 2050
Total Nuclear+RE cost is half Step Change at $384B vs $846B
Nuclear stops fossil fuels & has 1/4 the emissions & France proves it works every day
@zoedaniel.bsky.social
Zoe Daniel please support nuclear energy
Bowen is wrong about the costs in our system
Its not $600B -its only $198B by 2050
Total Nuclear + RE cost is half Step Change at $384B vs $846B
Nuclear stops fossil fuels & has 1/4 the emissions & France proves it works every day
Zoe Daniel please support nuclear energy
Bowen is wrong about the costs in our system
Its not $600B -its only $198B by 2050
Total Nuclear + RE cost is half Step Change at $384B vs $846B
Nuclear stops fossil fuels & has 1/4 the emissions & France proves it works every day
March 30, 2025 at 10:13 PM
@zoedaniel.bsky.social
Zoe Daniel please support nuclear energy
Bowen is wrong about the costs in our system
Its not $600B -its only $198B by 2050
Total Nuclear + RE cost is half Step Change at $384B vs $846B
Nuclear stops fossil fuels & has 1/4 the emissions & France proves it works every day
Zoe Daniel please support nuclear energy
Bowen is wrong about the costs in our system
Its not $600B -its only $198B by 2050
Total Nuclear + RE cost is half Step Change at $384B vs $846B
Nuclear stops fossil fuels & has 1/4 the emissions & France proves it works every day
Monique Ryan please support nuclear energy
@mon4kooyong.bsky.social
Bowen is wrong about the costs in our system
Its not $600B -its only $198B by 2050
Total Nuclear + RE cost is half Step Change at $384B vs $846B
Nuclear stops fossil fuels & has 1/4 the emissions & France proves it works every day
@mon4kooyong.bsky.social
Bowen is wrong about the costs in our system
Its not $600B -its only $198B by 2050
Total Nuclear + RE cost is half Step Change at $384B vs $846B
Nuclear stops fossil fuels & has 1/4 the emissions & France proves it works every day
March 30, 2025 at 10:07 PM
Monique Ryan please support nuclear energy
@mon4kooyong.bsky.social
Bowen is wrong about the costs in our system
Its not $600B -its only $198B by 2050
Total Nuclear + RE cost is half Step Change at $384B vs $846B
Nuclear stops fossil fuels & has 1/4 the emissions & France proves it works every day
@mon4kooyong.bsky.social
Bowen is wrong about the costs in our system
Its not $600B -its only $198B by 2050
Total Nuclear + RE cost is half Step Change at $384B vs $846B
Nuclear stops fossil fuels & has 1/4 the emissions & France proves it works every day
Bowen is wrong about the costs of nuclear in our system
Its not $600B -its only $198B by 2050
Total Nuclear + RE cost is half Step Change at $384B vs $846B
Nuclear stops fossil fuels & has 1/4 the emissions and it works, France proves it every day
@chrisbowenmp.bsky.social #energy #auspol
Its not $600B -its only $198B by 2050
Total Nuclear + RE cost is half Step Change at $384B vs $846B
Nuclear stops fossil fuels & has 1/4 the emissions and it works, France proves it every day
@chrisbowenmp.bsky.social #energy #auspol
March 30, 2025 at 9:32 PM
Bowen is wrong about the costs of nuclear in our system
Its not $600B -its only $198B by 2050
Total Nuclear + RE cost is half Step Change at $384B vs $846B
Nuclear stops fossil fuels & has 1/4 the emissions and it works, France proves it every day
@chrisbowenmp.bsky.social #energy #auspol
Its not $600B -its only $198B by 2050
Total Nuclear + RE cost is half Step Change at $384B vs $846B
Nuclear stops fossil fuels & has 1/4 the emissions and it works, France proves it every day
@chrisbowenmp.bsky.social #energy #auspol
Reposted by Robert Parker
President Andrzej Duda has signed a bill that designates funds from the national budget for the construction of Poland's first nuclear power plant - PLN60.2 billion (USD15.5 billion) in public funding between 2025 & 2030.
world-nuclear-news.org/articles/pre...
world-nuclear-news.org/articles/pre...
President signs bill on funding for Polish nuclear power plant
President Andrzej Duda has signed a bill that designates funds from the national budget for the construction of Poland's first nuclear power plant. Under the bill, Polskie Elektrownie Jądrowe is s...
world-nuclear-news.org
March 27, 2025 at 7:07 PM
President Andrzej Duda has signed a bill that designates funds from the national budget for the construction of Poland's first nuclear power plant - PLN60.2 billion (USD15.5 billion) in public funding between 2025 & 2030.
world-nuclear-news.org/articles/pre...
world-nuclear-news.org/articles/pre...
A 1000 megawatt nuclear power station using South Korean expertise could be built in the Latrobe Valley in seven years, with a fleet possibly in 11 years, at an estimated cost of $10 billion each, They have a carbon intensity of 6.5gCO2/kWh leaving RE for dead
www.facebook.com/share/p/16C4...
www.facebook.com/share/p/16C4...
Redirecting...
www.facebook.com
March 21, 2025 at 11:13 AM
A 1000 megawatt nuclear power station using South Korean expertise could be built in the Latrobe Valley in seven years, with a fleet possibly in 11 years, at an estimated cost of $10 billion each, They have a carbon intensity of 6.5gCO2/kWh leaving RE for dead
www.facebook.com/share/p/16C4...
www.facebook.com/share/p/16C4...
Reposted by Robert Parker
That's going to send him off the edge
Thousands of people are ditching Tesla. Here’s one of them with a message you can see from space.
Location: Black Rock Sands, Wales, UK
Led By Donkeys is 100% funded by small donations.
Location: Black Rock Sands, Wales, UK
Led By Donkeys is 100% funded by small donations.
March 17, 2025 at 6:33 PM
That's going to send him off the edge
The Australia Institute
@australiainstitute.org.au
is pushing for the perpetual use of gas
Pushing for only wind & solar means gas backup & campaigning against nuclear energy means more gas & more coal
Nuclear is our only way to fully decarbonise #auspol
nuclearforclimate.com.au/nuclear-plan...
@australiainstitute.org.au
is pushing for the perpetual use of gas
Pushing for only wind & solar means gas backup & campaigning against nuclear energy means more gas & more coal
Nuclear is our only way to fully decarbonise #auspol
nuclearforclimate.com.au/nuclear-plan...
Nuclear Plan for the NEM - Low Cost, Low Carbon, Reliable
Nuclear Plan for the NEM - Low Cost, Low Carbon, Reliable
nuclearforclimate.com.au
March 14, 2025 at 9:59 PM
The Australia Institute
@australiainstitute.org.au
is pushing for the perpetual use of gas
Pushing for only wind & solar means gas backup & campaigning against nuclear energy means more gas & more coal
Nuclear is our only way to fully decarbonise #auspol
nuclearforclimate.com.au/nuclear-plan...
@australiainstitute.org.au
is pushing for the perpetual use of gas
Pushing for only wind & solar means gas backup & campaigning against nuclear energy means more gas & more coal
Nuclear is our only way to fully decarbonise #auspol
nuclearforclimate.com.au/nuclear-plan...
Well Denise @deniseshrivell.bsky.social you can rest easy with your Climate 200 mates as you shit on the climate and oppose nuclear energy.
It is impossible to achieve deep carbon reductions at low cost without nuclear energy and lots of it
We must get rid of the ALP and the anti nuclear legislation
It is impossible to achieve deep carbon reductions at low cost without nuclear energy and lots of it
We must get rid of the ALP and the anti nuclear legislation
March 4, 2025 at 10:05 AM
Well Denise @deniseshrivell.bsky.social you can rest easy with your Climate 200 mates as you shit on the climate and oppose nuclear energy.
It is impossible to achieve deep carbon reductions at low cost without nuclear energy and lots of it
We must get rid of the ALP and the anti nuclear legislation
It is impossible to achieve deep carbon reductions at low cost without nuclear energy and lots of it
We must get rid of the ALP and the anti nuclear legislation
@zoedaniel.bsky.social is wrong to attack nuclear energy
Its our only way to achieve ultra low emissions
By 2120 using only wind & solar will deliver 6.1 billion tonnes of CO2
With nuclear its halved to 3.1 billion tonnes.
All based on Life Cycle Emissions
Please get fair dinkum Sophie - go nuclear
Its our only way to achieve ultra low emissions
By 2120 using only wind & solar will deliver 6.1 billion tonnes of CO2
With nuclear its halved to 3.1 billion tonnes.
All based on Life Cycle Emissions
Please get fair dinkum Sophie - go nuclear
March 4, 2025 at 12:14 AM
@zoedaniel.bsky.social is wrong to attack nuclear energy
Its our only way to achieve ultra low emissions
By 2120 using only wind & solar will deliver 6.1 billion tonnes of CO2
With nuclear its halved to 3.1 billion tonnes.
All based on Life Cycle Emissions
Please get fair dinkum Sophie - go nuclear
Its our only way to achieve ultra low emissions
By 2120 using only wind & solar will deliver 6.1 billion tonnes of CO2
With nuclear its halved to 3.1 billion tonnes.
All based on Life Cycle Emissions
Please get fair dinkum Sophie - go nuclear
There's been a lot of chat about the Govt's RE scheme outperforming nuclear with respect to emissions.
As anyone who is properly engaged on the issue knows emissions reductions need to be permanent, reliable, low cost and EFFECTIVE.
This is not a fashion contest.
As anyone who is properly engaged on the issue knows emissions reductions need to be permanent, reliable, low cost and EFFECTIVE.
This is not a fashion contest.
February 26, 2025 at 10:48 AM
There's been a lot of chat about the Govt's RE scheme outperforming nuclear with respect to emissions.
As anyone who is properly engaged on the issue knows emissions reductions need to be permanent, reliable, low cost and EFFECTIVE.
This is not a fashion contest.
As anyone who is properly engaged on the issue knows emissions reductions need to be permanent, reliable, low cost and EFFECTIVE.
This is not a fashion contest.
Here's James Hansen's latest post on the acceleration of global warming. He and colleagues outline the reasons and he restates why we need nuclear energy to address the problem.
Its welcome departure from both alarmists and deniers who are cut from the same cloth
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
Its welcome departure from both alarmists and deniers who are cut from the same cloth
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
Global Warming Has Accelerated: Are the United Nations and the Public Well-Informed?
Global temperature leaped more than 0.4°C (0.7°F) during the past two years, the 12-month average peaking in August 2024 at +1.6°C relative to the temperature at the beginning of last century (the ...
www.tandfonline.com
February 17, 2025 at 9:11 PM
Here's James Hansen's latest post on the acceleration of global warming. He and colleagues outline the reasons and he restates why we need nuclear energy to address the problem.
Its welcome departure from both alarmists and deniers who are cut from the same cloth
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
Its welcome departure from both alarmists and deniers who are cut from the same cloth
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
Reposted by Robert Parker
It's nuclear power. Onna boat. www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/kor... 🔌💡⚛️⛴️
Korean SMR-powered container ship design revealed
South Korea's HD Korea Shipbuilding & Offshore Engineering has unveiled a nuclear-powered container ship model utilising small modular reactor technology.
;
www.world-nuclear-news.org
February 13, 2025 at 11:32 PM
It's nuclear power. Onna boat. www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/kor... 🔌💡⚛️⛴️
@lairdmickd.bsky.social greetings Mick + the Dad jokes
February 11, 2025 at 7:50 AM
@lairdmickd.bsky.social greetings Mick + the Dad jokes
This video on nuclear energy in Australia has had arounf 117,000 views
It was produced by the IPA in Melbourne after Engineers Australia became a political arm of the wind and solar industry and banned me speaking.
We can't afford to have corrupted Institutions in this country
youtu.be/H6EyJcMet_c
It was produced by the IPA in Melbourne after Engineers Australia became a political arm of the wind and solar industry and banned me speaking.
We can't afford to have corrupted Institutions in this country
youtu.be/H6EyJcMet_c
The nuclear speech the Teals wanted cancelled | Robert Parker
YouTube video by Institute of Public Affairs
youtu.be
February 10, 2025 at 6:04 AM
This video on nuclear energy in Australia has had arounf 117,000 views
It was produced by the IPA in Melbourne after Engineers Australia became a political arm of the wind and solar industry and banned me speaking.
We can't afford to have corrupted Institutions in this country
youtu.be/H6EyJcMet_c
It was produced by the IPA in Melbourne after Engineers Australia became a political arm of the wind and solar industry and banned me speaking.
We can't afford to have corrupted Institutions in this country
youtu.be/H6EyJcMet_c
We compared AEMO ISP with Nuclear scenarios.
We find that 75% nuclear with solar, hydro, storage and a bit of wind costs 1/2 that of a full wind and solar scheme. It has only 34 g CO2/kWh vs 145 for AEMO's Step Change scenario.
Best of all we dont carpet our land in poles, wires and RE stuff
We find that 75% nuclear with solar, hydro, storage and a bit of wind costs 1/2 that of a full wind and solar scheme. It has only 34 g CO2/kWh vs 145 for AEMO's Step Change scenario.
Best of all we dont carpet our land in poles, wires and RE stuff
February 10, 2025 at 5:29 AM
We compared AEMO ISP with Nuclear scenarios.
We find that 75% nuclear with solar, hydro, storage and a bit of wind costs 1/2 that of a full wind and solar scheme. It has only 34 g CO2/kWh vs 145 for AEMO's Step Change scenario.
Best of all we dont carpet our land in poles, wires and RE stuff
We find that 75% nuclear with solar, hydro, storage and a bit of wind costs 1/2 that of a full wind and solar scheme. It has only 34 g CO2/kWh vs 145 for AEMO's Step Change scenario.
Best of all we dont carpet our land in poles, wires and RE stuff