Pablo Hubacher Haerle
banner
pablohh.bsky.social
Pablo Hubacher Haerle
@pablohh.bsky.social
Postdoc in philosophy @Uni Köln interested in mental health and self-knowledge | liberal Wittgensteinian | he/him
https://pablohubacherhaerle.ch
Certain characters from a Dostoevsky novel and some ideas from psychoanalysis make an appearance as well.
If this sounds interesting, here’s the preprint:
philpapers.org/rec/HUBUAX
(Open access version coming soon—thanks @unicologne.bsky.social )
#philsky #philosophypapers #academicsky 5/5
Pablo Hubacher Haerle, Uncertain Action - PhilPapers
It is a prominent idea in the theory of action that if an action is intentional, the agent knows the reason why they’re acting. This idea gets often ascribed to G.E.M. ...
philpapers.org
November 20, 2025 at 9:10 AM
Also since today is international men's day: if someone isn't aware of one's reasons—e.g., when they are based on misogyny—this doesn't mean that their action was not intentional. Cases like these were an important goal when writing that paper.

A recent example: www.youtube.com/watch?v=me1a...
Lily Allen - Sleepwalking (Visualiser)
YouTube video by Lily Allen
www.youtube.com
November 19, 2025 at 12:47 PM
I suggest we should take the latter option and I end by exploring a way in which Anscombe’s other core idea—that the practical syllogism is key for an action’s intentionality—can be reconciled with the phenomenon of uncertain action. 4/5
November 19, 2025 at 12:36 PM
I argue that actions like these put Anscombean theories in front of a dilemma:
1️⃣ either they have to conclude (implausibly) that these actions are not intentional after all, or
2️⃣ they have to give up the claim that whenever an action is intentional the agent knows their reasons for so acting.
3/5
November 19, 2025 at 12:36 PM
A paper forthcoming in *Synthese* argues that acting intentionally while being uncertain about one's reason is incompatible with classic views of practical knowledge. Think of a case like:
Did I congratulate you because you I truly think you deserved it or because I wanted to look good?
2/5
November 19, 2025 at 12:36 PM
NVM just saw it
November 6, 2025 at 4:57 PM
Is there new stuff on this out? i only know this journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research
Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
journals.sagepub.com
November 6, 2025 at 4:57 PM
November 5, 2025 at 5:43 PM
Oh i see, but they can‘t be integrated into the text I presume?
November 3, 2025 at 9:05 PM
Footnotes by a mile!
November 3, 2025 at 3:33 PM
Oh right! But there are other traditions in english where you do say „i do“, i believe
October 28, 2025 at 6:18 PM
What‘s the „i do“ mistake again? I was taught that people don‘t actually say „i do“ but instead they say „yes“ but then it seemed that that‘s not actually correct…
October 28, 2025 at 1:11 PM
still doesn‘t look fully repaired to me? Maybe they stopped the works too soon…
October 24, 2025 at 12:08 PM
Jup that looks spot on, many thanks!
October 16, 2025 at 8:07 PM
The same happened to me! It was a really annoying feature of icloud. Also, then there were these loops with other people who had out-of-office emails—one being a really intimidating professor
October 8, 2025 at 2:12 PM
September 30, 2025 at 8:34 AM