Every now and then I see this chart and think “huh, they just kinda put it all out there on a quarterly basis, don’t they?”

Selling an equity stake in an American business is a punishment, and not something that a foreign investor can do without consequence.

Thank god for this pro-business environment.

“It’s Joe’s conspiracy to rehabilitate this woman’s legacy and sanewash overreaching political actors to suit his agenda”

Joe:

What makes you say that? Def seems to be doing fine but thought their trade down effects + unique tariff situation might make them unique for 2H.

It’s silly to believe for one part of the Presidio but not for the other? If it’s worth conserving in part, why keep the built part instead of expand the park?

Yes, but only because I found Old Faithful really disappointing.

Presuming conservation is important to both of us, we don’t get to ascribe value to places that have already been deemed essential to conserve forever (basically).

To us, the Presidio and Muir are different projects, but they might not be to future generations. Protecting one is protecting another.

I’m thrilled that you’re excited to make that distinction, I’m sorry you misunderstood.

No conflation at all, I feel this way about all NPS land regardless of its designation.

Sorry you don’t appreciate relics of American Capitalism, but I do, and “unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations” is cut and dry.

The Yoda statue with have same reverence as Old Faithful in 2100 and our grandkids will thank us for not giving an inch when it comes to conservation.

“Verdun has to be here somewhere”