Openvaet / Canceledmouse
banner
openvaet.bsky.social
Openvaet / Canceledmouse
@openvaet.bsky.social
https://openvaet.substack.com

Interests in data analysis, statistics, open science, clinical trials integrity, corruption, fertility trends and censorship.
Why don't you precise that Levi is co-author of an in depth study on pregnancies risks of COVID 19 vaccination..?

While @vikilovesfacs.bsky.social has demonstrated countless times during the pandemic that she had a grasp of statistics & risk/benefit appraisal close to zero?
bsky.app/profile/open...
October 20, 2025 at 7:51 PM
You understand that this kind of papers usually isn't peer-reviewed in 20 days without review of the data ..?
openvaet.substack.com/p/pfizerbion...
Pfizer/BioNTech C4591001 Trial - Data Altered Between EUA & BLA Submissions
A brief look at the latest EUA release, resulting in a few additional evidence of blatant data manipulation.
openvaet.substack.com
September 7, 2025 at 11:38 PM
The problem is that Pfizer is lying. On pretty much everything.
openvaet.substack.com/p/pfizerbion...
Pfizer/BioNTech C4591001 Trial - Audit Report - v1 (2024-05-31)
Reanalysis of the data and anomalies inventoried
openvaet.substack.com
September 7, 2025 at 11:37 PM
And speaking about cringe... why do you use a picture from the inside of your nose as profile picture ?

Do you feel like it makes you.. impressive 🤔..?

If your friends haven't told that you that you look ridiculous they don't really respect you, Copy 😌
September 6, 2025 at 6:44 AM
Gosh this is so cringe. You're converting your twitter space's session abusing carefully selected dimwits in "podcasts" now Copy 😂?

Why don't we see you anymore in the Thursday's spaces, you were tired to be ridiculed and to have nothing more to reply than your ridiculous xenophobic tropes ?
September 6, 2025 at 6:43 AM
Reposted by Openvaet / Canceledmouse
Glad to see that nonsensical incitements to get the Covid vaccines for pregnant women have ended.

@vikilovesfacs.bsky.social, have you commented on the Guetzkow et al. preprint which joins Shimabukuro's data in pointing in an increase of miscarriage risk with these?
www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1...
Observed-to-Expected Fetal Losses Following mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination in Early Pregnancy
Background The clinical trials used to approve COVID-19 vaccines excluded pregnant women, and existing safety assessments of COVID-19 vaccination, particularly during early stages of pregnancy, are li...
www.medrxiv.org
September 3, 2025 at 3:16 AM
Glad to see that nonsensical incitements to get the Covid vaccines for pregnant women have ended.

@vikilovesfacs.bsky.social, have you commented on the Guetzkow et al. preprint which joins Shimabukuro's data in pointing in an increase of miscarriage risk with these?
www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1...
Observed-to-Expected Fetal Losses Following mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination in Early Pregnancy
Background The clinical trials used to approve COVID-19 vaccines excluded pregnant women, and existing safety assessments of COVID-19 vaccination, particularly during early stages of pregnancy, are li...
www.medrxiv.org
September 3, 2025 at 3:16 AM
Hi.

Your thread is entirely erroneous and misleading, as I demonstrated here.
bsky.app/profile/open...

Good day !
A thread on Pfizer's Process 1, Process 2, and why it matters.

As a preembule, let's let @pauloffit.bsky.social explain the old rule of the industry : "The process is the product" - with a short extract from "The Curious Case of Science".

1/
March 17, 2025 at 12:50 AM
Why do you claim to have left Twitter (while you're still there) or that Cat' harasses you (while it's the exact opposite), Mollie?

Your mythomania isn't limited to one network 🤔?
February 10, 2025 at 3:30 AM
Did you made it up, Funky ?
a man wearing a suit and tie is standing in a field of yellow flowers
ALT: a man wearing a suit and tie is standing in a field of yellow flowers
media.tenor.com
February 9, 2025 at 8:57 PM
Oh, it wasn't just one uninformed tweet, it was a full uninformed thread.

How do you care about safety when you're suppressing your adverse events, Bill ?
davidhealy.org/disappeared-...

Why do we have 5 Menorrhagia in the trial and 12 to 25% post roll-out, in your informed statistician opinion ?
Disappeared in Argentina - Dr. David Healy
Cause and Effect Case 2: Augusto Roux This post will have breaking news featured below. See entry for March 2, Augusto is a fit 36-year-old man from Buenos Aires. He doesn’t smoke or drink alcohol. He...
davidhealy.org
February 9, 2025 at 6:16 PM
Fact, this is one of the most corrupt studies in history which you're proudly relaying.

Find an error or stop your propaganda work please.
openvaet.substack.com/p/pfizerbion...
Pfizer/BioNTech C4591001 Trial - Audit Report - v1 (2024-05-31)
Reanalysis of the data and anomalies inventoried
openvaet.substack.com
February 9, 2025 at 6:11 PM
They also delayed the efficacy announcement to deny Trump his political victory, so I'm not sure he would be very well disposed toward Pfizer.
openvaet.substack.com/p/pfizerbion...
February 9, 2025 at 6:03 PM
The real problem was that the trial was entirely corrupt...
openvaet.substack.com/p/pfizerbion...

so the "95% efficacious at preventing symptomatic PCR" was never observed in real life.

The public certainly hasn't seen it, hence the collapsing trust.
Pfizer/BioNTech C4591001 Trial - Audit Report - v1 (2024-05-31)
Reanalysis of the data and anomalies inventoried
openvaet.substack.com
February 4, 2025 at 2:47 AM
It never measured this, but it did measure symptomatic positive PCRs, which makes the error of people who read the trial of "good faith one".

The way to control for transmission would have been regular n-bindings and pcr tests for every subject (to control for asymptomatic transmission).
February 4, 2025 at 2:43 AM
You can verify every source. What you're telling me is that you have abolished your critical sense.

This article is cosigned by experienced biostats, trial insiders, and university teachers. Keep your condescension and your "solid review" claims. Unconvincing.
www.bmj.com/content/378/...
Effect of mRNA Vaccine Manufacturing Processes on Efficacy and Safety Still an Open Question
www.bmj.com
January 30, 2025 at 3:44 AM
(You'll find nine as it has been reviewed by countless people and I find rather worrying that I'm learning you something.)

Allow me to conclude that your "audits" weren't very thorough 🙄
January 30, 2025 at 1:06 AM
My data is perfectly accurate and derives directly from the BLA documents made public through Phmpt.

Feel free to point an error between points 82 to 112 if you contest how many people received Process 2.
openvaet.substack.com/p/pfizerbion...
Every source and code line is handy.
Pfizer/BioNTech C4591001 Trial - Audit Report - v1 (2024-05-31)
Reanalysis of the data and anomalies inventoried
openvaet.substack.com
January 30, 2025 at 12:58 AM
Lastly as shown by my above chart, they could have announced the efficacy as planned per protocol on October 22. They waited after the election. This has nothing to do with the filing as they announced the efficacy via press, before the EUA submission.
January 29, 2025 at 1:18 PM
Firstly, the manufacturing process deployed to the public was tested on 252 persons, so I suggest that we cut short on the gaslighting.

Secondly, there are subjects records missing and the blinding wasn't followed in the US.

What do you call "auditing the data"?
bsky.app/profile/open...
A thread on Pfizer's Process 1, Process 2, and why it matters.

As a preembule, let's let @pauloffit.bsky.social explain the old rule of the industry : "The process is the product" - with a short extract from "The Curious Case of Science".

1/
January 29, 2025 at 1:15 PM