omicron-0b.bsky.social
@omicron-0b.bsky.social
Reposted
3/ “For example, it is envisaged that the provision would allow a
suitably qualified male to female transsexual to be able to take up employment in a single sex women's hospital. They could themselves be treated as a comparator by a male applicant.”

This shows, quite bluntly, the EHRC is wrong.
November 21, 2025 at 5:16 PM
Reposted
2/ The instructions are just… fascinating? Well, every piece of public record I’ve uncovered on this subject so far has been fascinating, but this paragraph is exceptional.

It contradicts the Supreme Court directly, comprehensively, and unequivocally.
November 21, 2025 at 5:07 PM
Reposted
November 17, 2025 at 9:32 PM