Roe Jan Rancher
olsenoid.bsky.social
Roe Jan Rancher
@olsenoid.bsky.social
Architect. Progressive. Anti-violence, anti-war, anti-MIC. Not ashamed of my Ivy League degree. Triggered by hypocrisy and censorship. I ❤️my family: human and 4-legged. 🏳️‍🌈
This major fuckup is on the morons over at ICE - like that Neanderthal Homan. Trump can’t be too happy about this- surely the Koreans don’t like their people to be embarrassed and shamed on the world stage.
September 8, 2025 at 12:20 AM
I want to believe GGreenwald, that Trump actually wants to see these wars end. But as has become apparent, Trump will only enact “policy” when it directly benefits himself or his inner circle. Agreed about Biden - he had a weird blind spot. Like a lot of old Dems.
May 28, 2025 at 7:10 PM
As a woman I endorse this message. Time to bring that word back, as needed.
April 29, 2025 at 2:03 PM
Rep Massie is pretty hard core
April 29, 2025 at 5:05 AM
Hey at least he’s admitting that it’s a thing.
April 21, 2025 at 6:05 PM
Geese are exemplary parents
April 18, 2025 at 11:50 AM
I don’t agree. Neither do the punters on polymarket.
April 18, 2025 at 3:23 AM
He’s going to blink on Garcia. He can’t fuck with SCOTUS, not after that Wilkinson decision today.
April 18, 2025 at 3:10 AM
Either you didn’t actually read my response or you lack reading comprehension. I said nothing about use of force. Obviously the judiciary has no enforcement arm. What I said is that Trump is going to read the room. And he will blink on this one. He needs SCOTUS too much to fuck with them.
April 18, 2025 at 3:06 AM
His uncanny spidey sense to read the room? Defying SCOTUS and FedSoc judges like Wilkinson is NOT a hill Trump should be willing to die on. This is not really about some gangbanger, you do get that right?
April 18, 2025 at 2:43 AM
Reposted by Roe Jan Rancher
I don’t think non-lawyers can appreciate how remarkable it is that the leading conservative intellectual voices of the 90s and 2000s - Judge Luttig, Judge Wilkinson, Walter Olson, Ben Ginsburg, etc. - are being this outspoken against a Republican president’s abuses. Huge kudos to all of them.
April 17, 2025 at 7:29 PM
Once your eyes are opened to the evil our govt has been capable of (Jfc look at Vietnam!) it’s hard to unsee. Painful, yet liberating in a way.
April 16, 2025 at 2:25 PM
This is quite true. Most people can’t (or won’t ) comprehend this, because prior administrations conducted this shit in secret, and weren’t gleefully using it as a photo op. Do we know how many brown people were disappeared during peak GWOT? The truth is sometimes very painful.
April 16, 2025 at 12:04 PM
The steel man here is that these rules were put into place under Bush and Obama, and that libertarians were squawking then. (All true). There’s a lesson here. Maybe listen to Ron Paul whenever he speaks? 🤷🏻‍♀️
April 16, 2025 at 11:54 AM
Having them in DC is a safety hazard.
April 16, 2025 at 11:41 AM
Well that was Econ 102 - macro- and not everybody got that far.
April 14, 2025 at 3:27 AM
Thanks. And good night!🌙
April 12, 2025 at 5:35 AM
Actually that’s not entirely true. Left unsaid here is that trading is about the only zero-sum game left. So the guys that lost out in the other side of these trades were likely other hedge funds or speculators. It’s only a loss to you if you choose to (or have to) liquidate your stock holdings.
April 11, 2025 at 5:00 PM
She should take out her extensions before they get caught in her weapon
April 9, 2025 at 12:00 AM
Just some wall st cunts creating real economic value. Profiting off the rest of us.
April 7, 2025 at 8:48 PM
Couldn’t have said it better.
April 7, 2025 at 8:45 PM