oatc
banner
oatc.bsky.social
oatc
@oatc.bsky.social
Human Rights defender, and politico
@oatc@mstdn.social & BirdApp: @_oatc_

🧜🏻‍♀️🧜🏻‍♀️🧜🏻‍♀️🧜🏻‍♀️🧜🏻‍♀️🧜🏻‍♀️🧜🏻‍♀️🧜🏻‍♀️🧜🏻‍♀️
💚⬜️🔴
😷💉
It didn't? You saw its use of "emasculating" as being about beneficial reduction of testosterone in law & order?
December 1, 2024 at 2:01 PM
However, Thiel's right hand person is a woman.
December 1, 2024 at 1:10 PM
Unfortunately you then reinforced the questionable meaning by posting "Apple defended women being treated like trash". Why not make your meaning clear n such vital matters?
December 1, 2024 at 1:03 PM
A nice patriarchal rationalisation. Do you think that's how women see it?
December 1, 2024 at 12:53 PM
No you didn't. Its' a very different bill with the most stringent safeguards anywhere.
December 1, 2024 at 12:52 PM
So when do you reckon every disabled person, person in poverty & people with mental health conditions will have been offered care & aid? Just trying to get some idea of how long people with 6 months to live in agony & deprived of dignity will need to wait.
December 1, 2024 at 12:51 PM
So you don't know what "emasculating" means? Why do men so often treat the masculine as the pinnacle & anything less not masculine with disdain, and think women will agree?
December 1, 2024 at 12:40 PM
The safeguards in the UK bill would prevent that. So can the desperate dying have assisted dying, please?
December 1, 2024 at 12:37 PM
"Rivals" in what respect, Jonathan?
December 1, 2024 at 12:26 PM
Motorway service areas have rents to pay, and all the expenses of providing services miles from any other premises. Plus, each service area is its own monopoly. All this has been the case since the first UK motorway opened.
December 1, 2024 at 12:21 PM
LaurenceM: "the forthcoming emasculation of law and order"
December 1, 2024 at 12:06 PM
But in a country where the government will always fight back & religious diversity & secularism are the tradition, no one will narrate the concerns & suffering of the population that want no bombs or gunfire, to have healthcare, education, freedom of dress, religious & secular tolerance.
December 1, 2024 at 12:05 PM
So if disabled people (except where die to their imminently terminal illness) were excluded from accessing Assisted Dying, would you then be OK with other desperately dying having access?
December 1, 2024 at 10:14 AM
Not in favour of women police, lawyers & judges aren't you, Laurence?
December 1, 2024 at 10:11 AM
So, QED then. Thanks for saving us the time, Greg.
December 1, 2024 at 9:15 AM
They adopted all the targeting of the Tories even before the election ("immigrants", disabled, trans people, the covid-vulnerable, Muslims) and now they're adding those too ill to work generally. TBH, seeking political advantage by demonising minorities is pure fascism so I'd dispute "centrists"
November 29, 2024 at 8:56 PM
…but that soft lass Labour MP Harriet Harman forgave her for it and they now count each other a good friends.
November 29, 2024 at 8:47 PM
The fact that the wrong lessons were learned from Shipman (who murdered hundreds of people, against their will, in order to steal their money using fake wills) may not have been enirely unconnected to opponents of assisted dying…
November 29, 2024 at 8:44 PM
Legend…
November 29, 2024 at 8:29 PM
Except the information was published by a friend of hers in 1955 but academics ignored that because she too was trans. And that again was posted online over a decade ago but in German & the anglosphere ignored that too.
November 29, 2024 at 8:22 PM