The answers are all written in Japanese on the screenshot…

And how were these headlines chosen? This means literally nothing except there are at least 49 articles people who work for the New York Times have written and you just happened across them and not the ones about the protests, should there be any.

He must’ve forgotten something lol

But if the appointment took all day then you would be happier about this? You have more time on your hands now. Look at the silver lining more often and you’ll find yourself happier with yourself.

lmfaoo 😆

Stay mad. You’re the one who chimed into a stranger’s post.

You’re misunderstanding what I’m saying. I am saying the mathematics works out better to fit the data. In the same way the Planck constant was invented to fit the data for the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, MWI’s mathematical models explain decoherence better.

But to your point. The Born rule is one of which no one knows why it works, thus refuting MWI by saying the Born rule is misrepresented is just the other side of the same coin. Again, the mathematics just works out better and matches the experimental data better with MWI than it does with Copenhagen

Yea don’t lump me in with the others because I definitely criticize everyone who plays into that kind of mysticism. You don’t know me. I don’t care about fantasy or science fiction. My driving force, what keeps me up at night, is the unshakable yearn to understand the true workings of the universe.

It doesn’t overcomplicate it. It solves a complicated problem.

It is not mysticism. The math works out best with it. Instead of having to explain wave function collapse. It’s indicative of the Richard Feinmann tale of the “infinite slits”. We must consider all possibilities because indeed quantum waves do take all possible paths.