[4/4] Our approach is by design a meta-method: you can use it with your favorite single-cell RNA-based GRN inference tool, and squeeze more insights out of your data! Check us out GitHub: github.com/aliaaz99/GRN....
[4/4] Our approach is by design a meta-method: you can use it with your favorite single-cell RNA-based GRN inference tool, and squeeze more insights out of your data! Check us out GitHub: github.com/aliaaz99/GRN....
[3/4] We use these embeddings to construct a prior graph and then further refine it with some known TF-target interactions as pre-training targets. Finally, we use this augmented prior graph jointly with a GRN inferred by *any* other method, in order to produce a final prediction.
November 28, 2025 at 9:49 PM
[3/4] We use these embeddings to construct a prior graph and then further refine it with some known TF-target interactions as pre-training targets. Finally, we use this augmented prior graph jointly with a GRN inferred by *any* other method, in order to produce a final prediction.
Nicolae Sapoval @nsapoval.bsky.social presented "Theoretical and empirical performance of pseudo-likelihood- based Bayesian inference of species trees under the multispecies coalescent" A fantastic theory talk, offering intuitive insights! Paper: doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.28.635282
November 6, 2025 at 8:28 PM
Nicolae Sapoval @nsapoval.bsky.social presented "Theoretical and empirical performance of pseudo-likelihood- based Bayesian inference of species trees under the multispecies coalescent" A fantastic theory talk, offering intuitive insights! Paper: doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.28.635282
As the next step, we aim to develop rigorous corrections to the pseudo-likelihood-based credibility intervals in order to further improve scalability and applicability of Baeysian phylogenomic inference.
February 2, 2025 at 12:11 AM
As the next step, we aim to develop rigorous corrections to the pseudo-likelihood-based credibility intervals in order to further improve scalability and applicability of Baeysian phylogenomic inference.
In our work we explore suitability of pseudo-likelihood for Bayesian phylogenomic inference. We show that using pseudo-likelihood greatly reduces the computational burden of the Bayesian inference. However, the inferred credibility intervals are overconfident.
February 2, 2025 at 12:11 AM
In our work we explore suitability of pseudo-likelihood for Bayesian phylogenomic inference. We show that using pseudo-likelihood greatly reduces the computational burden of the Bayesian inference. However, the inferred credibility intervals are overconfident.
Likelihood-based phylogenomic inference is common, but it faces scalability issues. Hence, pseudo-likelihood has been previously proposed as a statistically consistent (for topology estimation) and scalable alternative: doi.org/10.1186/1471...
Likelihood-based phylogenomic inference is common, but it faces scalability issues. Hence, pseudo-likelihood has been previously proposed as a statistically consistent (for topology estimation) and scalable alternative: doi.org/10.1186/1471...
This is aimed primarily at the people who are just starting their thesis-based masters or a PhD. However, it’s also an evolving document, so suggestions and ideas are welcome!
January 1, 2025 at 6:48 PM
This is aimed primarily at the people who are just starting their thesis-based masters or a PhD. However, it’s also an evolving document, so suggestions and ideas are welcome!