in the case of journal articles: the abstract is right there. i don’t want another, worse, abstract.

in the case of, for example, MY OWN CV: 😖😖😖

i’m not being sarcastic i sincerely look fwd to finding out and also might re-listen to the wilfred owen episode of the magnus archives, just to get really freaked out

what’s more horrifying: the things that actually happened in wwi OR ghosts

finished it in daylight. fun! next up: ‘the warm hands of ghosts’ by katherine arden.

i’m a big coward but i’m still having a good time

other titles that tickled me: ‘dinky’, ‘flip flap’, ‘nippy’, ‘whoops!’ and ‘zowie bedtime stories’

i do, perhaps pettily, remember oseman’s comments about bl in which she dismissed the whole genre as fetishistic, which i did not care for tbh

i don’t think we can point to any single factor to explain why misogyny is so prevalent, but i can’t help but think about cps declining to prosecute andrew tate after 3 women made credible accusations of abuse

the report frames porn as something that men consume and that women are victimised by. men and boys can only be hurt by it in the sense that it enforces toxic masculinity.

expression, information, existence. good stuff.