'Scientifically and medically', is this is a person of colour?
November 13, 2025 at 11:54 AM
'Scientifically and medically', is this is a person of colour?
Posted this yesterday. I think it applies here.
November 11, 2025 at 1:43 PM
Posted this yesterday. I think it applies here.
Maybe get back to me when you've developed one of these.
November 11, 2025 at 11:38 AM
Maybe get back to me when you've developed one of these.
"I see no evidence."
November 11, 2025 at 11:18 AM
"I see no evidence."
Well done 'babe'.
November 11, 2025 at 10:51 AM
Well done 'babe'.
Absolutely right. It's like one of those old Mad magazine fold-ins.
November 11, 2025 at 10:15 AM
Absolutely right. It's like one of those old Mad magazine fold-ins.
Indeed. Unfortunately, as this piece demonstrates, Lewis was captured some time ago. Someone being 'clearly gender critical' is enough to deserve his ire.
November 10, 2025 at 11:45 PM
Indeed. Unfortunately, as this piece demonstrates, Lewis was captured some time ago. Someone being 'clearly gender critical' is enough to deserve his ire.
And yet your ideology maintains that we should reject who people are in favour of who they say they are.
November 10, 2025 at 12:44 PM
And yet your ideology maintains that we should reject who people are in favour of who they say they are.
Incorrect. She didn't say that about trans people, but about 'people who adopt wholesale the notion that sex isn’t real, or that gender identity must and should replace it in all situations, or who transition because of this social contagion.'
But you knew that.
But you knew that.
November 9, 2025 at 5:46 PM
Incorrect. She didn't say that about trans people, but about 'people who adopt wholesale the notion that sex isn’t real, or that gender identity must and should replace it in all situations, or who transition because of this social contagion.'
But you knew that.
But you knew that.
The targeting of Martine Croxall:
The headline (1) and what lies behind it (2, 3, 4).
I love the #BBC, but right now they seem determined to repeatedly punch themselves in the face.
The headline (1) and what lies behind it (2, 3, 4).
I love the #BBC, but right now they seem determined to repeatedly punch themselves in the face.
November 8, 2025 at 9:19 AM
The targeting of Martine Croxall:
The headline (1) and what lies behind it (2, 3, 4).
I love the #BBC, but right now they seem determined to repeatedly punch themselves in the face.
The headline (1) and what lies behind it (2, 3, 4).
I love the #BBC, but right now they seem determined to repeatedly punch themselves in the face.
So the BBC's Executive Complaints Unit maintains that saying 'pregnant women' is 'expressing a personal view on a controversial issue', but saying 'pregnant people' isn't?
Bring it on, you pillocks. It will only generate massive support for Martine Croxall.
Bring it on, you pillocks. It will only generate massive support for Martine Croxall.
November 7, 2025 at 9:47 AM
So the BBC's Executive Complaints Unit maintains that saying 'pregnant women' is 'expressing a personal view on a controversial issue', but saying 'pregnant people' isn't?
Bring it on, you pillocks. It will only generate massive support for Martine Croxall.
Bring it on, you pillocks. It will only generate massive support for Martine Croxall.
So you acknowledge that “predatory men” could enter single-sex female spaces by posing as trans women, but you're arguing that they won't ... because people would know they weren't 'real' trans women?
Not sure you've properly thought this through ...
Not sure you've properly thought this through ...
November 4, 2025 at 9:20 PM
So you acknowledge that “predatory men” could enter single-sex female spaces by posing as trans women, but you're arguing that they won't ... because people would know they weren't 'real' trans women?
Not sure you've properly thought this through ...
Not sure you've properly thought this through ...
From trainee accountant chic to heroin worshipping rock god in 12 short years.
November 4, 2025 at 8:00 PM
From trainee accountant chic to heroin worshipping rock god in 12 short years.
Cathy needed to clarify because you don't understand simple logic. She helped you out, and you berate her for it.
November 4, 2025 at 6:20 PM
Cathy needed to clarify because you don't understand simple logic. She helped you out, and you berate her for it.
Yes, 'any human anywhere', but not 'every human everywhere'. Some people, no matter how privileged, will fail to make good use of the opportunities afforded them.
November 3, 2025 at 1:15 PM
Yes, 'any human anywhere', but not 'every human everywhere'. Some people, no matter how privileged, will fail to make good use of the opportunities afforded them.
Here comes the new Amber. #TheArchers
October 27, 2025 at 10:05 AM
Here comes the new Amber. #TheArchers
You're a hoot.
October 25, 2025 at 7:52 AM
You're a hoot.
Is there a medical condition whereby an individual can be so toxic that his own immune system attempts to reject him?
No, no reason.
No, no reason.
October 24, 2025 at 10:43 AM
Is there a medical condition whereby an individual can be so toxic that his own immune system attempts to reject him?
No, no reason.
No, no reason.
Jan 6 2021:
'What do we want?'
'A GOLDEN BALLROOM!'
'When do we want it?'
'NOW!'
'What do we want?'
'A GOLDEN BALLROOM!'
'When do we want it?'
'NOW!'
October 23, 2025 at 10:46 PM
Jan 6 2021:
'What do we want?'
'A GOLDEN BALLROOM!'
'When do we want it?'
'NOW!'
'What do we want?'
'A GOLDEN BALLROOM!'
'When do we want it?'
'NOW!'
Old-fashioned flesh and blood Reform councillors are such a disappointment, the party has developed a cyber version to replace them.
October 22, 2025 at 7:29 PM
Old-fashioned flesh and blood Reform councillors are such a disappointment, the party has developed a cyber version to replace them.