We organise in the here and now, to build a new order.

Its not "my side", I am also not from the US, it will be via global organising or we are all doomed.
That come revolution the workers self organise utilising anarchist federalism to avoid the power constructs of statism such that a new ruling elite are not established.

Ahh yes, fingers in the ears I can't here you response.
If you have no idea what anarchists are proposing, you have no basis for any critique outside stubborn ignorance.

You dont even know what we propose.

Its representative democracy that doesnt work. you're flogging a dead horse

The 'democratic' party simply retains the status quo, and the fascists who understand it's weaknesses exploit it's structures of power to gain control.

The idea that the rich will allow you to vote away their wealth is something that will never happen.
As you stated, people will abuse if given the ability to, so we have to organise via methods that avoid power constructs. That yhe working class cannot achieve that is a matter of opinion, not fact.

what do you consider defined Bakunin's position as an argument for a state?
Bakunin didn’t smuggle a state he opposed any power above society, his 'collective dictatorship' was organised influence without office, while Marx “non‑state” kept a centralised public power that slid into party rule

Where have I argued that capitalism must occur before anarchism?
I havent. So you again will probably just make shit up about what words mean.

No, I was met with anarchists organising in China not long ago. The people of China do understand that socialism is not a particular form of state. you are simply wrong they are ignorant
They have experience of arguments of socialism across the Asiatic, and understand it has a diverse form.

Anarchism embodies socialism at its most free. no bosses, no state, just self-managed workplaces, voluntary association, and collective decision-making from the bottom up.

Oh come on, tell me how you dont understand what socialism means.

I'm not wrong though, am I?
No need to answer.
I think this dismissive tendency to the meanings of words out of the US is a form of American exceptionalism, just as eurocentrism exists.

"We are convinced that freedom without Socialism is privilege and injustice, and that Socialism without freedom is slavery and brutality." Bakunin

"As to their economical conceptions, the anarchists, in common with all socialists, of whom they constitute the left wing…consider the wage system and capitalist production altogether as an obstacle to progress…” Kropotkin

"Anarchy is synonymous with Socialism. Because both signify the abolition of exploitation and of the domination of man over man, whether maintained by the force of arms or by the monopolization of the means of life."
Errico Malatesta

you got upset that the way you talk identifies you as from the US.
Maybe ask yourself why it does.