The State of NJ site may contain optional links, information, services and/or content from other websites operated by third parties that are provided as a convenience, such as Google™ Translate. Google™ Translate is an online service for which the user pays nothing to obtain a purported language translation. The user is on notice that neither the State of NJ site nor its operators review any of the services, information and/or content from anything that may be linked to the State of NJ site for any reason. -Read Full Disclaimer -->

Text SIGN PFPWUB to 50409 to send this to your officials.

⊘Anti-Censorship Campaign ⊘ ⟡ Complaint Letter Template Customer Complaint Dept, This message is to lodge an official complaint about the ongoing rampant restrictions your company has placed on ...

Text SIGN PARPDB to 50409 — I urge you in the strongest possible terms to vote NO on H.R. 1. Buried in this bill is a provision that would eviscerate the judiciary’s ability to enforce its own orders against government officials—a radical attack on the rule of law, judicial independence, and the balance of powers enshrined in our Constitution. The provision in question would prohibit federal courts from using appropriated funds to enforce contempt citations for violations of injunctions or restraining orders unless a plaintiff has posted a security bond under Rule 65(c). This may sound technical, but the impact is devastating and crystal clear: government officials—including the president—could ignore court orders without consequence unless citizens or civil rights groups come up with funds they almost never have. Worse, this measure would apply retroactively—nullifying enforcement of countless existing court orders. Civil rights injunctions, immigration-related orders, and protections secured through decades of legal battles would become unenforceable overnight. This is not legislation—it’s sabotage of our judiciary’s authority. Let’s be honest about who benefits: Donald Trump and his executive cronies, many of whom have already shown brazen contempt for court rulings. This bill would grant them virtual immunity from judicial restraint by simply daring the public to find the cash to hold them accountable. That’s not democracy—it’s despotism dressed up as budget policy. Our courts cannot become advisory bodies. We cannot allow one branch of government to neuter another. This provision is a flagrant violation of the separation of powers and a direct step toward authoritarianism. This is a red line. Defend the Constitution. Vote NO on H.R. 1.

Text SIGN PJIXGI to 50409 to send this to your officials.

The BLOP hosts a large and detailed list of upcoming protest events submitted by users across the United States.

Text SIGN PZPQZL to 50409 — I’m writing to demand that Kilmar Abrego-Garcia be brought back to the U.S. immediately. What’s happened to him at our hands is sickening and deeply unjust. Congress must intervene. The claim that the Trump administration lacks the power or authority to bring Abrego-Garcia back is simply false. Past administrations, including the Biden administration, have successfully facilitated the return of individuals who were wrongfully deported — including veterans deported during Trump's first administration. The precedent and legal authority exist. What’s missing is the will to act – and the courage to take responsibility for the chaos that Trump’s mass deportation agenda has caused. The Supreme Court has spoken: Abrego-Garcia was wrongly deported and must be returned to the U.S and reunited with his wife and children. No president is above the law and no family should be torn apart because President Trump refuses to be held accountable. Bring Abrego-Garcia back NOW! And rein Trump in before he destroys our democracy. Thanks.

A non-partisan campaign has gathered more than 250,000 signatures demanding that Congress begin impeachment proceedings against Trump.

Bless this guy.

The team used a Reddit-made archive of the CDC website to create a new live mirror of the site before it was purged.